Fix Content model social_media_provider validation

[springwq]

Changes

• Removed contradictory allow_blank: true from social_media_provider validation
• Consolidated two validation rules into one for better clarity

Problem

The Content model had conflicting validation rules:

• Line 11: validates :social_media_provider, presence: true (required)
• Line 12: validates :social_media_provider, inclusion: { in: social_media_providers.keys }, allow_blank: true (allows blank)

The allow_blank: true option contradicted the business requirement that social_media_provider is a required field.

Solution

Merged the two validations into a single rule:

validates :social_media_provider, presence: true, inclusion: { in: social_media_providers.keys }

This ensures the field is both required and restricted to valid enum values (instagram, tiktok, youtube).

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!