feat(expense): support multiple payers (port #146) #396
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Add ExpensePaidBy model and migration to backfill from paidById\n- Update API to handle multiple payers; adjust exports, balances, totals\n- Update UI: expense form with multi-payer add/remove + total, expense card\n- Add amount-input component; fix NaN previews using derived total\n- Add i18n keys for participant and total\n\nBREAKING CHANGE: Expense.paidById removed in favor of ExpensePaidBy.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
port Add support for multiple payers #146
Add ExpensePaidBy model and migration to backfill from paidById
Update API to handle multiple payers; adjust exports, balances, totals
Update UI: expense form with multi-payer add/remove + total, expense card
Add i18n keys for participant and total
BREAKING CHANGE: Expense.paidById removed in favor of ExpensePaidBy.