Skip to content
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
The table of contents is too big for display.
Diff view
Diff view
  •  
  •  
  •  
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion .gitignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,4 +75,6 @@ package-lock.json
yarn.lock
bun.lockb
uv.lock
.codegpt
.codegpt

legacy/
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
{
"analysis": "1. **Summary Assessment**: No, the PR cannot be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: \n - The changes in the PR are focused on fixing a specific bug related to the computation of the separability matrix for nested `CompoundModels` in the `astropy` library. The modification in the code is a single-line change in the `_cstack` function, which directly addresses the bug by altering how the `cright` matrix is constructed.\n - The test patch adds new test cases to verify the correctness of the fix. These tests are directly related to the bug fix and are necessary to ensure that the change works as intended.\n - The nature of the change is such that the code modification and the corresponding tests are tightly coupled. The tests are designed to validate the specific behavior that the code change is intended to correct.\n\n3. **If NO**:\n - The PR cannot be logically split because the code change and the test cases are both integral parts of the bug fix. The code change alone would not be meaningful without the tests to verify its correctness, and the tests alone would not be useful without the code change to fix the bug.\n - The specific aspect that makes it a cohesive unit is the direct relationship between the code modification and the test cases. The tests are specifically crafted to validate the behavior corrected by the code change.\n - It would be impractical to test parts independently because the tests are designed to verify the specific bug fix. Without the code change, the tests would fail, and without the tests, the code change would not be validated.",
"can_be_split": false,
"raw_response": {
"id": "chatcmpl-B6Lv36EtPcVYVtGLRw4klIEvwEFNY",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "1. **Summary Assessment**: No, the PR cannot be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: \n - The changes in the PR are focused on fixing a specific bug related to the computation of the separability matrix for nested `CompoundModels` in the `astropy` library. The modification in the code is a single-line change in the `_cstack` function, which directly addresses the bug by altering how the `cright` matrix is constructed.\n - The test patch adds new test cases to verify the correctness of the fix. These tests are directly related to the bug fix and are necessary to ensure that the change works as intended.\n - The nature of the change is such that the code modification and the corresponding tests are tightly coupled. The tests are designed to validate the specific behavior that the code change is intended to correct.\n\n3. **If NO**:\n - The PR cannot be logically split because the code change and the test cases are both integral parts of the bug fix. The code change alone would not be meaningful without the tests to verify its correctness, and the tests alone would not be useful without the code change to fix the bug.\n - The specific aspect that makes it a cohesive unit is the direct relationship between the code modification and the test cases. The tests are specifically crafted to validate the behavior corrected by the code change.\n - It would be impractical to test parts independently because the tests are designed to verify the specific bug fix. Without the code change, the tests would fail, and without the tests, the code change would not be validated.",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1740853925,
"model": "gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": "fp_eb9dce56a8",
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 327,
"prompt_tokens": 1738,
"total_tokens": 2065,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
},
"metadata": {
"repo": "astropy/astropy",
"instance_id": "astropy__astropy-12907",
"base_commit": "d16bfe05a744909de4b27f5875fe0d4ed41ce607",
"version": "4.3",
"difficulty": "15 min - 1 hour",
"timestamp": "2025-03-01 10:32:15"
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
{
"analysis": "1. **Summary Assessment**: Yes, the PR can be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: The changes in the PR can be logically divided into two parts: one part involves the addition of a utility function to format error messages, and the other part involves the modification of the error message logic to use this new utility function. These changes can be independently developed and tested, even though they are related.\n\n3. **If YES**:\n - **Part 1**: \n - **Includes**: The addition of the `as_scalar_or_list_str` utility function within the `_check_required_columns` method.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on creating a utility function that formats objects as strings, which can be used in various contexts beyond the specific error message.\n - **Test Cases**: This part can be tested by creating a separate test function that verifies the output of `as_scalar_or_list_str` for different input scenarios (e.g., single item, list of items, non-list object).\n - **Coordination Needed**: Minimal coordination is needed, as this function is self-contained and does not affect other parts of the code until it is used.\n\n - **Part 2**:\n - **Includes**: The modification of the error message logic in the `_check_required_columns` method to use the `as_scalar_or_list_str` function.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on improving the error message by utilizing the new utility function to provide clearer and more accurate feedback to the user.\n - **Test Cases**: This part can be tested by verifying that the error messages are correctly formatted when required columns are missing or incorrect, as demonstrated in the `test_required_columns` test case.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Some coordination is needed to ensure that the utility function is correctly integrated into the error message logic.\n\nBy splitting the PR in this manner, each part can be developed and tested independently, allowing for more focused code reviews and potentially faster integration.",
"can_be_split": true,
"raw_response": {
"id": "chatcmpl-B6Lv3k4W1qICox8pfD49u0IK2DTmQ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "1. **Summary Assessment**: Yes, the PR can be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: The changes in the PR can be logically divided into two parts: one part involves the addition of a utility function to format error messages, and the other part involves the modification of the error message logic to use this new utility function. These changes can be independently developed and tested, even though they are related.\n\n3. **If YES**:\n - **Part 1**: \n - **Includes**: The addition of the `as_scalar_or_list_str` utility function within the `_check_required_columns` method.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on creating a utility function that formats objects as strings, which can be used in various contexts beyond the specific error message.\n - **Test Cases**: This part can be tested by creating a separate test function that verifies the output of `as_scalar_or_list_str` for different input scenarios (e.g., single item, list of items, non-list object).\n - **Coordination Needed**: Minimal coordination is needed, as this function is self-contained and does not affect other parts of the code until it is used.\n\n - **Part 2**:\n - **Includes**: The modification of the error message logic in the `_check_required_columns` method to use the `as_scalar_or_list_str` function.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on improving the error message by utilizing the new utility function to provide clearer and more accurate feedback to the user.\n - **Test Cases**: This part can be tested by verifying that the error messages are correctly formatted when required columns are missing or incorrect, as demonstrated in the `test_required_columns` test case.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Some coordination is needed to ensure that the utility function is correctly integrated into the error message logic.\n\nBy splitting the PR in this manner, each part can be developed and tested independently, allowing for more focused code reviews and potentially faster integration.",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1740853925,
"model": "gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": "fp_eb9dce56a8",
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 417,
"prompt_tokens": 2176,
"total_tokens": 2593,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
},
"metadata": {
"repo": "astropy/astropy",
"instance_id": "astropy__astropy-13033",
"base_commit": "298ccb478e6bf092953bca67a3d29dc6c35f6752",
"version": "4.3",
"difficulty": "15 min - 1 hour",
"timestamp": "2025-03-01 10:32:17"
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
{
"analysis": "1. **Summary Assessment**: No, the PR cannot be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: \n - The changes in the PR are focused on a single logical task: modifying the behavior of how structured `np.ndarray` columns are handled in the `astropy.table` module. Specifically, it removes the automatic conversion of structured arrays to `NdarrayMixin` and updates the tests accordingly.\n - The modification in the `table.py` file is directly related to the changes in the test files. The test updates are necessary to ensure that the new behavior is correctly validated. This makes the changes interdependent.\n - The test modifications are not standalone; they are directly tied to the change in behavior of the `_convert_data_to_col` function. Without the change in the main code, the test updates would not make sense, and vice versa.\n\n3. **If NO**:\n - The PR cannot be logically split because the removal of the `NdarrayMixin` conversion and the corresponding test updates are inherently linked. The tests are designed to verify the new behavior introduced by the code change.\n - The cohesive unit here is the change in how structured arrays are handled and the validation of this change through tests. Separating them would result in incomplete functionality or untestable code.\n - It would be impractical to test parts independently because the test changes are specifically designed to validate the new behavior introduced by the code modification. Without the code change, the tests would not pass, and without the tests, the code change would not be verified.",
"can_be_split": false,
"raw_response": {
"id": "chatcmpl-B6Lv3EwJumEpugcB1xJOebhaQmMqg",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "1. **Summary Assessment**: No, the PR cannot be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: \n - The changes in the PR are focused on a single logical task: modifying the behavior of how structured `np.ndarray` columns are handled in the `astropy.table` module. Specifically, it removes the automatic conversion of structured arrays to `NdarrayMixin` and updates the tests accordingly.\n - The modification in the `table.py` file is directly related to the changes in the test files. The test updates are necessary to ensure that the new behavior is correctly validated. This makes the changes interdependent.\n - The test modifications are not standalone; they are directly tied to the change in behavior of the `_convert_data_to_col` function. Without the change in the main code, the test updates would not make sense, and vice versa.\n\n3. **If NO**:\n - The PR cannot be logically split because the removal of the `NdarrayMixin` conversion and the corresponding test updates are inherently linked. The tests are designed to verify the new behavior introduced by the code change.\n - The cohesive unit here is the change in how structured arrays are handled and the validation of this change through tests. Separating them would result in incomplete functionality or untestable code.\n - It would be impractical to test parts independently because the test changes are specifically designed to validate the new behavior introduced by the code modification. Without the code change, the tests would not pass, and without the tests, the code change would not be verified.",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1740853925,
"model": "gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": "fp_eb9dce56a8",
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 320,
"prompt_tokens": 14998,
"total_tokens": 15318,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
},
"metadata": {
"repo": "astropy/astropy",
"instance_id": "astropy__astropy-13236",
"base_commit": "6ed769d58d89380ebaa1ef52b300691eefda8928",
"version": "5.0",
"difficulty": "15 min - 1 hour",
"timestamp": "2025-03-01 10:32:14"
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
{
"analysis": "1. **Summary Assessment**: Yes, the PR can be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: The PR introduces two main changes: \n - Enhancements to the ITRS frame to support location attributes and additional documentation.\n - Implementation of new transformations between ITRS and observed frames (AltAz and HADec), including refraction handling.\n\n3. **If YES**:\n - **Part 1**: \n - **Includes**: Changes to `itrs.py` and `__init__.py` files.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on enhancing the ITRS frame by adding a location attribute and updating the documentation to reflect these changes. It also includes the import of the new `itrs_observed_transforms` module.\n - **Test Cases**: Tests related to the ITRS frame's new attributes and documentation can be included here.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Ensure that the new attributes are correctly utilized in the transformations implemented in Part 2.\n\n - **Part 2**: \n - **Includes**: The new `itrs_observed_transforms.py` file and modifications in `intermediate_rotation_transforms.py`.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part implements the new transformation logic between ITRS and observed frames, including handling of refraction. It is independent of the ITRS frame enhancements, focusing on the transformation logic.\n - **Test Cases**: Tests for the new transformation functions, including those for refraction handling, can be included here.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Ensure that the transformations correctly utilize the ITRS frame's new attributes from Part 1.\n\n - **Test Division**: \n - Tests for the ITRS frame enhancements and documentation updates can be separated from tests for the new transformation logic.\n - Each part can be tested independently, ensuring that the ITRS frame enhancements work as expected and that the transformations produce correct results.\n\nBy splitting the PR into these two parts, each can be developed and tested independently, allowing for more focused reviews and potentially faster integration.",
"can_be_split": true,
"raw_response": {
"id": "chatcmpl-B6Lv3O01dcqml4RoDKI6fP9tIPrpI",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "1. **Summary Assessment**: Yes, the PR can be split into two logical parts.\n\n2. **Reasoning**: The PR introduces two main changes: \n - Enhancements to the ITRS frame to support location attributes and additional documentation.\n - Implementation of new transformations between ITRS and observed frames (AltAz and HADec), including refraction handling.\n\n3. **If YES**:\n - **Part 1**: \n - **Includes**: Changes to `itrs.py` and `__init__.py` files.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part focuses on enhancing the ITRS frame by adding a location attribute and updating the documentation to reflect these changes. It also includes the import of the new `itrs_observed_transforms` module.\n - **Test Cases**: Tests related to the ITRS frame's new attributes and documentation can be included here.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Ensure that the new attributes are correctly utilized in the transformations implemented in Part 2.\n\n - **Part 2**: \n - **Includes**: The new `itrs_observed_transforms.py` file and modifications in `intermediate_rotation_transforms.py`.\n - **Logical Separation**: This part implements the new transformation logic between ITRS and observed frames, including handling of refraction. It is independent of the ITRS frame enhancements, focusing on the transformation logic.\n - **Test Cases**: Tests for the new transformation functions, including those for refraction handling, can be included here.\n - **Coordination Needed**: Ensure that the transformations correctly utilize the ITRS frame's new attributes from Part 1.\n\n - **Test Division**: \n - Tests for the ITRS frame enhancements and documentation updates can be separated from tests for the new transformation logic.\n - Each part can be tested independently, ensuring that the ITRS frame enhancements work as expected and that the transformations produce correct results.\n\nBy splitting the PR into these two parts, each can be developed and tested independently, allowing for more focused reviews and potentially faster integration.",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1740853925,
"model": "gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": "fp_eb9dce56a8",
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 438,
"prompt_tokens": 9938,
"total_tokens": 10376,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
},
"metadata": {
"repo": "astropy/astropy",
"instance_id": "astropy__astropy-13398",
"base_commit": "6500928dc0e57be8f06d1162eacc3ba5e2eff692",
"version": "5.0",
"difficulty": "1-4 hours",
"timestamp": "2025-03-01 10:32:17"
}
}
Loading