Skip to content

Conversation

@sonyccd
Copy link
Owner

@sonyccd sonyccd commented Jan 15, 2026

No description provided.

@sonyccd sonyccd merged commit 47a11f8 into main Jan 15, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Jan 15, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
openhamprep Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 15, 2026 5:28pm

@sonyccd sonyccd deleted the sonyccd-patch-1 branch January 15, 2026 17:28
@supabase
Copy link

supabase bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Updates to Preview Branch (sonyccd-patch-1) ↗︎

Deployments Status Updated
Database ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC
Services ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC
APIs ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC

Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed.
Close and reopen this PR if you want to apply changes from existing seed or migration files.

Tasks Status Updated
Configurations ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC
Migrations ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC
Seeding ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC
Edge Functions ⏸️ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:29:22 UTC

View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎.
Learn more about Supabase for Git ↗︎.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Pull Request Review - PR #164

Summary

This PR removes the file docs/openhamprep-event-system-v1.5.pdf from the repository.

Review Findings

Positive Aspects

  1. Clean Deletion: The PR cleanly removes a binary PDF file from the docs directory with no code changes.

  2. No Broken References: A search across the codebase confirmed there are no references to this file in any source code, documentation, or configuration files.

  3. Repository Hygiene: Removing outdated or unnecessary documentation files helps keep the repository lean and maintainable.

📋 Observations

  1. Missing Context: The PR has no description explaining:

    • Why this file is being removed
    • Whether the content is outdated, moved elsewhere, or no longer needed
    • If there's a replacement document or if the event system is no longer relevant
  2. Documentation Gap: If this document described a feature or architecture (event system v1.5), consider:

    • Adding a note to relevant markdown docs about what happened to this system
    • If the event system is still in use, documenting it in markdown format instead of PDF (easier to diff and maintain in git)

💡 Recommendations

For Future PRs:

  • Always include a brief description explaining the "why" behind deletions
  • For documentation removals, consider if any replacement or migration notes are needed
  • If removing versioned docs (v1.5), clarify if there's a newer version elsewhere

For This Change:

  • ✅ The deletion itself is safe and clean
  • Consider documenting what the event system is (if still relevant) in a markdown file like docs/EVENT_SYSTEM.md for better maintainability

Verdict

APPROVED

This is a straightforward file deletion with no code impact. The change is safe to merge. The only improvement would be adding context about why the file was removed in the PR description.


Note: This PR has already been merged. This review is provided for documentation and learning purposes.

@sentry
Copy link

sentry bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.01%. Comparing base (ae53972) to head (93c84ef).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #164   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.01%   87.01%           
=======================================
  Files         119      119           
  Lines       14891    14891           
  Branches     2302     2302           
=======================================
  Hits        12958    12958           
  Misses       1933     1933           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants