Update Checkstyle Jar #613
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ZakkeryDaRebel
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2025
Contributor
ZakkeryDaRebel
left a comment
ZakkeryDaRebel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If I'm not mistaken, this checkstyle will check student's commented out code, and dock code quality if it is too much commented out code, and if the code doesn't follow regex naming conventions? Or is there something else it is doing?
Contributor
|
@Maillman you may need to change a string that has the name of the file in it somewhere @ZakkeryDaRebel It's the entire code quality checker (including duplicate code checks, etc.). This version is just better at determining what comments are code |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Updates the checkstyle jar with an improvement to the commented code check.
For more information regarding this improvement, read softwareconstruction240/checkstyle#11