Skip to content

Conversation

@pftg
Copy link
Collaborator

@pftg pftg commented Dec 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced testing coverage for new Ruby versions.
    • Conditional screenshot uploads for test failures only.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for screenshot mismatches in tests.
    • Updated assertions for screenshot functionalities to ensure reliability.
  • Tests

    • Refined test cases for screenshot comparisons and handling failures.
    • Adjusted test logic for screenshot functionality to improve accuracy.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@pftg has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44338a3 and 4d1387f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • test/fixtures/app/doc/screenshots/linux/cuprite/index-cropped.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • test/fixtures/app/doc/screenshots/linux/cuprite/index.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration and the screenshot testing framework. The workflow update adds conditional screenshot upload on test failure and expands matrix testing with new Ruby versions. In the screenshot testing, the changes focus on refining assertion methods, improving error handling, and maintaining the existing test structure for screenshot comparisons.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml - Added if: failure() to screenshot upload step
- Enhanced matrix strategy with Ruby 3.4.0-preview1 and jruby-head
.github/actions/setup-ruby-and-dependencies/action.yml - Added step to update package list
- Updated cache-apt-pkgs-action version to tests-v2
- Included fallback for libvips installation
.github/actions/upload-screenshots/action.yml - Removed conditional upload based on test outcome
- Changed artifact name to ${{ inputs.name }}-diffs and added new upload step for ${{ inputs.name }}-capybara-fails
test/capybara/screenshot/diff_test.rb - Replaced screenshot "a" with assert_matches_screenshot "a"
- Updated error handling for screenshot mismatches
- Refined test cases for screenshot comparisons

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test Runner
    participant Screenshot Module
    participant Assertion Handler

    Test Runner->>Screenshot Module: Take screenshot
    Screenshot Module->>Assertion Handler: Compare screenshot
    alt Screenshot matches
        Assertion Handler-->>Test Runner: Pass test
    else Screenshot differs
        alt fail_on_difference is true
            Assertion Handler-->>Test Runner: Raise error
        else fail_on_difference is false
            Assertion Handler-->>Test Runner: Aggregate failure
        end
    end
Loading

Possibly Related PRs

Poem

🐰 In GitHub's testing ground, a rabbit hops with glee,
Screenshots captured when tests fail, precision's key!
Ruby versions dance, matrix strategy so bright,
Conditional uploads make our workflow just right!
Test, capture, assert - our rabbit's testing art! 🧪


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pftg pftg force-pushed the build-review-broken-tests branch from 6ad2d1b to 82a2b53 Compare December 20, 2024 23:03
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/actions/upload-screenshots/action.yml (1)

18-22: Consider adding conditional upload for Capybara failures

While separating Capybara failures into a distinct artifact is good, consider adding a condition to only upload when screenshots exist to avoid empty artifacts.

     - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      if: hashFiles('tmp/capybara/screenshots-diffs/*') != ''
       with:
         name: ${{ inputs.name }}-capybara-fails
         retention-days: 1
         path: |
           tmp/capybara/screenshots-diffs/
.github/actions/setup-ruby-and-dependencies/action.yml (1)

33-34: Document cache version bump reason

The cache version bump from tests-v1 to tests-v2 should be documented to help track cache invalidation reasons.

-        version: tests-v2
+        # Bumped to v2 to address CI test failures with outdated package versions
+        version: tests-v2
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2460cca and 44338a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/setup-ruby-and-dependencies/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/upload-screenshots/action.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/actions/upload-screenshots/action.yml (1)

13-17: LGTM: Clear artifact naming for screenshot diffs

The modified artifact name with -diffs suffix provides better clarity on the content type.

Comment on lines +25 to +27
- run: sudo apt-get -qq update
shell: bash

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize apt-get update execution

The apt update should only run when we're not using cached packages or when the cache miss occurs.

-    - run: sudo apt-get -qq update
-      shell: bash
+    - name: Update apt package lists
+      if: ${{ inputs.cache-apt-packages != 'true' }}
+      run: sudo apt-get -qq update
+      shell: bash
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- run: sudo apt-get -qq update
shell: bash
- name: Update apt package lists
if: ${{ inputs.cache-apt-packages != 'true' }}
run: sudo apt-get -qq update
shell: bash

Comment on lines +35 to +37
# fallback if cache version is outdated
- run: sudo apt-get -qq install libvips
shell: bash
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve fallback installation reliability

The fallback installation should update package lists before installing to ensure we don't hit stale package versions.

     # fallback if cache version is outdated
-    - run: sudo apt-get -qq install libvips
+    - name: Fallback libvips installation
+      run: |
+        sudo apt-get -qq update
+        sudo apt-get -qq install libvips
       shell: bash
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# fallback if cache version is outdated
- run: sudo apt-get -qq install libvips
shell: bash
# fallback if cache version is outdated
- name: Fallback libvips installation
run: |
sudo apt-get -qq update
sudo apt-get -qq install libvips
shell: bash

pftg added 2 commits December 21, 2024 00:18
Added patterns to ignore .webp files alongside .png for reports. This ensures consistency in ignoring generated report files across formats. Helps maintain a cleaner working directory.
@pftg pftg merged commit ac76bb7 into master Dec 20, 2024
5 checks passed
@pftg pftg deleted the build-review-broken-tests branch December 20, 2024 23:23
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants