Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #295 will improve performances by ×18Comparing 🎉 Hooray!
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_fit_known |
266.8 ms | 92.1 ms | ×2.9 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_feature_signature[128] |
555.7 µs | 410.4 µs | +35.41% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_feature_signature[2] |
563.4 µs | 413.4 µs | +36.29% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_fit_sklearn[1024] |
5.3 s | 4.5 s | +17.09% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_fit_sklearn[128] |
668.1 ms | 570.6 ms | +17.09% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score[1024] |
8.5 ms | 7 ms | +22.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score[1048576] |
8.4 s | 6.9 s | +21.16% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-1024] |
9.8 ms | 8.3 ms | +18.56% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-1048576] |
9.7 s | 8.3 s | +17.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-1] |
264.8 µs | 128.9 µs | ×2.1 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-32] |
614.1 µs | 458.6 µs | +33.92% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-1024] |
18 ms | 15.1 ms | +19.7% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-1048576] |
17.9 s | 15 s | +19.39% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-1] |
276.2 µs | 161.4 µs | +71.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-32] |
978.7 µs | 775.8 µs | +26.15% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-1024] |
5.6 ms | 4.8 ms | +17.97% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-1048576] |
5.5 s | 4.7 s | +15.8% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-1] |
223.6 µs | 111.6 µs | ×2 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-32] |
428.6 µs | 294.3 µs | +45.63% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_benchmark_score_samples[2-128-1024] |
10.1 ms | 8.3 ms | +22.08% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Footnotes
-
No successful run was found on
master(399502c) during the generation of this report, so c78dece was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩ -
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
|
LGTM |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.