Skip to content

Conversation

@seqan-actions
Copy link
Member

@seqan-actions seqan-actions commented Mar 8, 2025

No description provided.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint and removed lint labels Mar 8, 2025
@seqan-actions
Copy link
Member Author

Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/chopper/285

@seqan-actions seqan-actions force-pushed the actions/update_cpm_package_lock branch from 67befa5 to c087786 Compare March 15, 2025 12:39
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint and removed lint labels Mar 15, 2025
@seqan-actions seqan-actions force-pushed the actions/update_cpm_package_lock branch from c087786 to 60049ba Compare March 22, 2025 12:40
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint and removed lint labels Mar 22, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.56%. Comparing base (282c7f4) to head (60049ba).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #285   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.56%   95.56%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         766      766           
  Branches       17       17           
=======================================
  Hits          732      732           
  Misses         34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@eseiler eseiler merged commit a56a48d into main Mar 22, 2025
28 checks passed
@eseiler eseiler deleted the actions/update_cpm_package_lock branch March 22, 2025 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants