Add regex assertions assert_all_strings_contain() and assert_string_contains()

[selkamand]

Motivation

• Replace the old regex assertion with clearer, focused APIs for string regex checks and centralize pattern validation in a helper.
• Provide both a vector-level assertion (assert_all_strings_contain) and a string-level assertion (assert_string_contains) that reuse the same validation logic.

Description

• Add contains_pattern() helper that validates pattern and grepl flags and returns whether all elements match the regex.
• Implement assert_all_strings_contain() as a chain of assert_character_vector, assert_no_missing, and an assert_create() wrapper around contains_pattern with a default error message.
• Implement assert_string_contains() as assert_create_chain(assert_string, assert_all_strings_contain) so single-string checks reuse the vector-level logic.
• Remove the old assert_matches_regex manpage and update NEWS.md, NAMESPACE, and tests to reflect the new assertion names and behavior.

Testing

• Ran devtools::document() which regenerated Rd files and updated NAMESPACE successfully.
• Ran devtools::test() and unit tests passed after adding coverage for assert_string_contains (tests report all tests passing).
• Ran devtools::check() which completed but returned 1 WARNING (missing qpdf for PDF size checks) and 1 NOTE (unable to verify current time), causing a non-zero exit status; there are no test failures reported.

---

Codex Task

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c64c50e058

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Reject missing regex patterns before grepl

When pattern is NA_character_, is_string(pattern) returns TRUE, so this helper proceeds to grepl() and R throws invalid 'pattern' argument instead of the assertion’s normal error formatting. That means callers who pass a missing pattern (e.g., pattern = NA) get a base error rather than the expected assertion message. Consider explicitly rejecting is.na(pattern) (or reusing assert_no_missing for pattern) so missing patterns fail with a consistent assertion error.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.