SECURESIGN 12 | Enable Podman build for TUF server image#1
Conversation
Gregory-Pereira
force-pushed
the
midstream-enable-tuf-server-podman-deployment
branch
3 times, most recently
from
9e8f181 to
a03eeb3
Compare
|
Has been removed from TP1, |
|
PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest tide |
|
@Gregory-Pereira: The
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/test tide |
|
@Gregory-Pereira: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
lgtm |
lance
left a comment
lance
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A couple of minor comments regarding comments ;) otherwise lgtm
Gregory-Pereira
force-pushed
the
midstream-enable-tuf-server-podman-deployment
branch
from
a03eeb3 to
fd3a5a0
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Gregory-Pereira, sabre1041 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: greg pereira <grpereir@redhat.com>
Gregory-Pereira
force-pushed
the
midstream-enable-tuf-server-podman-deployment
branch
from
fd3a5a0 to
41e4cdf
Compare
5 participants
Attempts to Address [SECURESIGN-12].
Not sure if there is a cleaner / better implementation strategy.
/cc @saber1041
/cc @sallyom