-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
WIP: Avoid mem timeouts #22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| - error messages more descriptive | ||
| - a warning is issued if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| - error messages more descriptive | |
| - a warning is issued if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter. | |
| - more descriptive error messages | |
| - issue a warning if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter |
| { | ||
| int index; | ||
| mpq_class a; | ||
| for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) { | |
| for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) { |
|
@ambros-gleixner this is not ready yet.. |
|
Okay, the changes in viprchk all looked fine to me. And you are planning to create a separate sequential and parallel completion script? |
No description provided.