Skip to content

Conversation

@alexhoen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Comment on lines +6 to +7
- error messages more descriptive
- a warning is issued if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- error messages more descriptive
- a warning is issued if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter.
- more descriptive error messages
- issue a warning if the numbers in the labels are not consistent with the internal VIPR counter

{
int index;
mpq_class a;
for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {
for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {

@alexhoen
Copy link
Member Author

@ambros-gleixner this is not ready yet..

@alexhoen alexhoen changed the title Avoid mem timeouts WIP: Avoid mem timeouts Jan 21, 2026
@ambros-gleixner
Copy link
Member

Okay, the changes in viprchk all looked fine to me. And you are planning to create a separate sequential and parallel completion script?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants