Skip to content

Update bootsnap 1.18.6 → 1.23.0 (minor)#874

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
depfu/update/bootsnap-1.23.0
Open

Update bootsnap 1.18.6 → 1.23.0 (minor)#874
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
depfu/update/bootsnap-1.23.0

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ bootsnap (1.18.6 → 1.23.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.23.0

What's Changed

  • Require Ruby 2.7.
  • Fix support for absolute paths in BOOTSNAP_IGNORE_DIRECTORIES.

Full Changelog: v1.22.0...v1.23.0

1.22.0

What's Changed

  • Proper fix for the opendir crash.
  • Add bootsnap/rake for cleaning the bootsnap cache as part of rake clobber.

Full Changelog: v1.21.1...v1.22.0

1.21.1 (from changelog)

  • Prevent a Ruby crash while scanning load path if opendir fails without setting errno. According to the C spec this should not happen, but according to user reports, it did.

1.21.0 (from changelog)

  • Fix the require decorator to handle Bootsnap.unload_cache! being called.
  • Minor optimization: Eagerly clear cache buffers to appease the GC.

1.20.1

What's Changed

  • Handle broken symlinks in load path scanning code.
    Should fix Errno::ENOENT fstatat issues some users have encountered after upgrading to 1.20.0.

Full Changelog: v1.20.0...v1.20.1

1.20.0

What's Changed

  • Optimized load path scanning with a C extension. Should be about 2x faster on supported platforms.

Full Changelog: v1.19.0...v1.20.0

1.19.0 (from changelog)

  • Remove JSON parsing cache. Recent versions of the json gem are as fast as msgpack if not faster.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 52 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Technical Debt Technical Debt labels Mar 2, 2026
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Sorry, but the merge failed with:

At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.

1 similar comment
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Sorry, but the merge failed with:

At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.00%. Comparing base (ec0f2c8) to head (ff374c1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #874   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    98.00%   98.00%           
========================================
  Files           78       78           
  Lines         1755     1755           
========================================
  Hits          1720     1720           
  Misses          35       35           
Flag Coverage Δ
pull_request 98.00% <ø> (ø)
push 98.00% <ø> (ø)
ruby 98.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Technical Debt Technical Debt

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants