[ux] Handle pipeline name request edge cases

[StephenHulme]

Closes missing pipeline name on transitional purposes, alternative to #2737.

Changes proposed in this pull request

• determine pipeline groups from subsets of criteria
• refactor pipeline info presenter

After screenshots:

Instructions for Reviewers

[All PRs] - Confirm PR template filled
[Feature Branches] - Review code
[Production Merges to main]
    - Check story numbers included
    - Check for debug code
    - Check version

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.93%. Comparing base (78f5d04) to head (013eb3b).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2743   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.93%   84.93%           
========================================
  Files          501      501           
  Lines        20598    20600    +2     
  Branches       377      377           
========================================
+ Hits         17495    17497    +2     
  Misses        3100     3100           
  Partials         3        3           

Flag	Coverage Δ
javascript	80.25% <ø> (ø)
pull_request	84.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
push	84.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
ruby	92.54% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.