Skip to content

plan: fix release tap policy/workflow mismatch#8

Closed
sandover wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
plan/daily-audit-2026-02-25
Closed

plan: fix release tap policy/workflow mismatch#8
sandover wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
plan/daily-audit-2026-02-25

Conversation

@sandover
Copy link
Owner

@sandover sandover commented Feb 25, 2026

Summary

  • audited commits since 2026-02-24T18:46:07Z and found one issue in release process alignment
  • added ergo task L2EMGQ to track resolving docs/skill vs workflow behavior drift
  • scoped task to remove CI tap mutation path and keep verification-only sync checks

Why this matters

docs/record/releasing.md and skills/plasmite-release-manager/SKILL.md now require local maintainer tap updates, but .github/workflows/release-publish.yml still has CI commit/push logic.

Changes in this PR

  • .ergo/events.jsonl (new planning task only)

Validation

  • plan-only change; no runtime code modified

Adds an ergo task from the daily audit for commit-window review.

The task targets a concrete docs-vs-workflow mismatch in release-publish.

Current docs and skill text require local Homebrew tap updates before publish.

Workflow still attempts CI commit/push and keeps a token-gated mutation path.

That split-brain process risks drift, duplicate writes, and ambiguous ownership.

Planned acceptance criteria enforce verification-only CI behavior for tap sync.

Validation gates include ripgrep checks and just ci-fast for regression safety.

No product code was changed; only planning state in .ergo/events.jsonl.

This keeps work scoped, reversible, and ready for one-shot implementation.
@sandover
Copy link
Owner Author

Superseded by #11 after .ergo/events.jsonl -> .ergo/plans.jsonl migration. Closing stale PR to keep planning diffs mergeable on current main.

@sandover sandover closed this Feb 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant