Conversation
This change modifies `Token::Table` to store the original string representation, allowing it to be used as an identifier with correct casing. It replaces the previous hack in `SqlParser::expect_identifier` with proper handling of the `Token::Table` variant. A new method `consume_table_keyword` is added to `SqlParser` to handle `Token::Table` consumption since it's no longer a unit variant. Changes: - Update `Token::Table` to `Token::Table(String)` in `src/core/query/sql/tokenizer.rs`. - Update `SqlTokenizer` to capture the table keyword string. - Update `SqlParser::expect_identifier` in `src/core/query/sql/parser/core.rs` to return the stored string for `Token::Table`. - Add `SqlParser::consume_table_keyword` to handle matching `Token::Table` regardless of its payload. - Update `SqlParser` in `src/core/query/sql/parser/statement.rs` to use `consume_table_keyword`. - Update `parser_tests.rs` to match the new debug output format for `Token::Table`.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
|
Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!
If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state. You can manage your notification settings |
![recurseml[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1054195?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by RecurseML
🔍 Review performed on 1740f02..808fd1b
✨ No bugs found, your code is sparkling clean
✅ Files analyzed, no issues (4)
• src/core/query/sql/parser/core.rs
• src/core/query/sql/parser/statement.rs
• src/core/query/sql/tests/parser_tests.rs
• src/core/query/sql/tokenizer.rs
1 participant
Refactored Token::Table to carry the original string payload, enabling correct identifier parsing for the keyword "TABLE" and resolving a parser hack. Updated parser logic to consume the new token variant correctly.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 15208312873007818251 started by @ryancinsight
High-level PR Summary
This PR refactors the
Token::Tableenum variant to store the original string identifier, removing a parser hack that previously treated the TABLE keyword as a generic identifier. The tokenizer now preserves the original string when creatingToken::Table, and the parser adds a dedicatedconsume_table_keyword()method to handle this token variant properly. This ensures correct identifier parsing while maintaining the keyword's special status in SQL grammar.⏱️ Estimated Review Time: 5-15 minutes
💡 Review Order Suggestion
src/core/query/sql/tokenizer.rssrc/core/query/sql/parser/core.rssrc/core/query/sql/parser/statement.rssrc/core/query/sql/tests/parser_tests.rs