Skip to content

Conversation

@rogerthomas84
Copy link

@rossj - The 50,000 limit is incorrect. The limit is actually 100,000,000 (soft limit) as per documentation here:
https://community.rackspace.com/products/f/25/t/597

Great little library though, thank you 👍

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea why this has been included in the diff. Nothings changed in this line.

@rogerthomas84
Copy link
Author

This may actually be incorrect. Looking again now and the page mentions container limits. There's a post here: https://community.rackspace.com/products/f/25/t/597

100 million apparently

@rogerthomas84
Copy link
Author

Closing PR as it's incorrect.

@rogerthomas84 rogerthomas84 reopened this Apr 22, 2014
@rogerthomas84 rogerthomas84 changed the title Changes 50,000 limit to 500,000 as per documentation Changes 50,000 limit to 100,000,000 as per advise Apr 22, 2014
@rogerthomas84
Copy link
Author

@rossj this has been reopened now and the limit has been changed to 100,000,000 (One hundred million) objects per container.

@rogerthomas84 rogerthomas84 changed the title Changes 50,000 limit to 100,000,000 as per advise Changes 50,000 limit to 100,000,000 as per advice Apr 22, 2014
@rossj
Copy link
Owner

rossj commented Apr 22, 2014

@rogerthomas84 Thanks for the PR. I've seen a lot of different size recommendations floating around for different use cases. It used to be that the rate limiting of 100 reqs / sec started only at 50,000 files, and went to 4 / sec above 5 million. This does seem to no longer be the case based on the docs.

How about making this a user option that can be overridden?

@rogerthomas84
Copy link
Author

@rossj I'll take a look at implementing that, I'm looking at some new functionality for it so I'll try to build that in. For now, feel free to close or merge this and I'll raise a new one for config changes (there will be a few).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants