Skip to content

Conversation

@vepadulano
Copy link
Member

I'd like to start testing again the case highlighted by #13361

Note at the beginning: the issue arose with runtime_cxxmodules=OFF and I'm not sure we have that in the CI so we might not see errors right away

@vepadulano vepadulano self-assigned this Jun 4, 2024
@vepadulano vepadulano requested review from bellenot and linev as code owners June 4, 2024 16:34
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Test Results

    17 files      17 suites   2d 21h 33m 15s ⏱️
 3 269 tests  3 269 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
54 197 runs  54 197 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 4a1a56c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@linev
Copy link
Member

linev commented Jun 5, 2024

One should test with runtime_cxxmodules=OFF

@vepadulano
Copy link
Member Author

One should test with runtime_cxxmodules=OFF

Indeed, it's what I wrote in the PR description. I hoped that we had at least one build with that option. This means that currently there is no build with runtime_cxxmodules=OFF and we should understand if that's intended/desirable or not.

@linev
Copy link
Member

linev commented Jun 13, 2024

I tried runtime_cxxmodules=OFF on my desktop Linux and it works well.

@vepadulano vepadulano closed this Nov 21, 2024
@vepadulano vepadulano reopened this Nov 21, 2024
@vepadulano vepadulano added the clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR label Jan 29, 2025
@vepadulano vepadulano closed this Jan 29, 2025
@vepadulano vepadulano reopened this Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Member

@linev linev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine

@vepadulano
Copy link
Member Author

@linev No it's not unfortunately. As you can see from the runtime_cxxmodules=OFF build of the CI, we still have the same errors on ROOT master:

  Error in <TProtoClass::FindDataMember>: data member with index 0 is not found in class tuple<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup*,default_delete<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup> >
  Error in <CreateRealData>: Cannot find data member # 0 of class tuple<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup*,default_delete<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup> > for parent ROOT::RFileDialog!
  Error in <TProtoClass::FindDataMember>: data member with index 1 is not found in class tuple<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup*,default_delete<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup> >
  Error in <CreateRealData>: Cannot find data member # 1 of class tuple<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup*,default_delete<ROOT::RBrowserDataCleanup> > for parent ROOT::RFileDialog!
  Second verify all classes for any overlaps

So this PR #13900 was not enough to fix the issue. In fact, judging from the discussion at #15733, we would need at least to wait until #16202 is merged. Maybe then both the issue in this PR and in #15733 will be fixed.

@vepadulano vepadulano closed this Jul 8, 2025
@vepadulano vepadulano reopened this Jul 8, 2025
@vepadulano
Copy link
Member Author

Good news @pcanal @linev , the build with runtime_cxxmodules=OFF is green! It looks like #16202 was indeed the right fix.

@pcanal can we go ahead and merge this?

Copy link
Member

@pcanal pcanal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@pcanal pcanal merged commit fa5a499 into root-project:master Jul 8, 2025
56 of 64 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants