Skip to content

feat(Staking): implement migration logic#169

Open
TuDo1403 wants to merge 7 commits intorelease/v0.8.2from
feature/staking-migration
Open

feat(Staking): implement migration logic#169
TuDo1403 wants to merge 7 commits intorelease/v0.8.2from
feature/staking-migration

Conversation

@TuDo1403
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Contract changes

The table below shows the following info:

  • Logic: the logic is changed.
  • ABI: the ABI is changed.
  • Init data: new storage field is declared and needs initializing.
  • Dependent: needs to be changed due to changes in other contracts.
Contract name Logic ABI Init data Dependent
FastFinalityTracking
GovernanceAdmin
Maintenance
Profile
SlashIndicator
Staking
StakingVesting
ValidatorSet

Checklist

  • I have chosen the base of the PR to the release/** branch.
  • I have named the PR following the format of [contract_name] what_is_changed, where contract_name is the list of changed contracts, separated by |, or is * if there is changed in more than 3 contracts
  • I have ticked in the Contract changes table to guide the deployer which contracts to be upgraded.
  • I have clearly commented on all the main functions following the NatSpec Format
  • The box that allows repo maintainers to update this PR is checked
  • I tested locally to make sure this feature/fix works

@TuDo1403 TuDo1403 force-pushed the feature/staking-migration branch from 47c1cf3 to 438d410 Compare November 19, 2025 09:46
@TuDo1403 TuDo1403 changed the title Feature/staking migration feat(Staking): implement migration logic Nov 19, 2025
@TuDo1403 TuDo1403 force-pushed the feature/staking-migration branch from 438d410 to 028942f Compare December 12, 2025 11:07
@TuDo1403 TuDo1403 force-pushed the feature/staking-migration branch from ef35084 to 7bfb7da Compare January 28, 2026 20:30
@TuDo1403 TuDo1403 force-pushed the feature/staking-migration branch from 7bfb7da to 30034ef Compare January 28, 2026 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants