Skip to content

docs: Update project documentation to reflect actual implementation #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
rmjoia merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2025
Merged

docs: Update project documentation to reflect actual implementation #13

rmjoia merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2025

Conversation

@rmjoia
Copy link
Owner

@rmjoia rmjoia commented Nov 23, 2025

Summary

Updates all project documentation to accurately reflect the actual implementation completed in Phase 1 Week 2.

Changes Made

📋 Specification Updates

  • spec.md: Updated testing framework from Jasmine/Karma → Vitest (TypeScript-first approach)

📋 Plan Updates

  • plan.md: Updated Principle 2 to reference Vitest unit tests (≥80% coverage requirement)

✅ Task Status Updates

  • phase-1-week-2-detailed-tasks.md:
    • Status changed to "✅ Landing Page COMPLETED" (November 18, 2025)
    • Admin dashboard, email templates, i18n infrastructure marked as deferred to Phase 2
    • Updated success criteria with completion checkmarks

📖 README Enhancements

  • Added comprehensive Technology Stack section:
    • Frontend: Astro 5.15+ with TypeScript, Tailwind CSS
    • Infrastructure: PowerShell + Bicep (IaC), Azure Static Web Apps
    • Planned: Node.js serverless, Cosmos DB, GitHub OAuth, SendGrid
  • Added Current Status section:

📊 Project Status Updates

  • PROJECT_STATUS.md:
    • Added Deployed Environments section with live URLs
    • Updated to reflect November 23, 2025 status
    • Added Landing Page Deployment and Infrastructure Automation sections
    • Updated task tracking table with Phase 1 completion status
    • Removed subscription IDs for security (kept subscription names only)
    • Updated team allocation status
    • Refreshed next steps and success metrics

Live Deployments

Documentation Accuracy

All documentation now correctly reflects:

  • ✅ Actual tech stack (Astro + TypeScript, not Statiq)
  • ✅ Testing framework (Vitest, not Jasmine/Karma)
  • ✅ Infrastructure approach (PowerShell + Bicep automation)
  • ✅ Landing page completion status
  • ✅ Deferred items (admin dashboard, email, i18n → Phase 2)
  • ✅ Live deployment URLs

Related PRs

Checklist

  • All tech stack references updated to actual implementation
  • Task completion status accurately reflects work done
  • Live deployment URLs documented
  • Sensitive information (subscription IDs) removed
  • README enhanced with comprehensive tech stack section
  • PROJECT_STATUS updated with current state

@rmjoia
docs: Update project documentation to reflect actual implementation
366fc67 
- Update spec.md: Change testing framework from Jasmine/Karma to Vitest (TypeScript-first)
- Update plan.md: Update Principle 2 to reference Vitest unit tests (≥80%)
- Update phase-1-week-2-detailed-tasks.md: Mark landing page as COMPLETED (Nov 18), defer admin dashboard to Phase 2
- Update README.md: Add Technology Stack section with current (Astro, PowerShell+Bicep) and planned tech (Node.js, Cosmos DB)
- Update PROJECT_STATUS.md: Add deployed environments section, update completion status, remove subscription IDs for security

All documentation now accurately reflects:
- Live deployments: codepals.io (prod), dev.codepals.io (dev)
- Actual tech stack: Astro + TypeScript (not Statiq)
- Testing approach: Vitest (not Jasmine/Karma)
- Infrastructure: PowerShell + Bicep automation
- Phase 1 Week 2 landing page completion status
@rmjoia rmjoia added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed do-not-merge labels Nov 23, 2025
@rmjoia rmjoia self-assigned this Nov 23, 2025
@rmjoia rmjoia merged commit c881527 into main Nov 23, 2025
@rmjoia rmjoia deleted the feat/update-project-documentation branch November 23, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@rmjoia rmjoia

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rmjoia