Skip to content

Conversation

@danmanor
Copy link
Member

@danmanor danmanor commented Nov 16, 2025

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentially performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regeneration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

This PR also adds the path to the quorum-restore-pod so its ips will be changed as well

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added Pod support to Kubernetes type handling in the etcd layer
    • Enhanced pod status IP field updates during IP address transitions, including podIP, hostIP, and podIPs fields
    • Expanded YAML file pattern coverage for the restoration process
  • Bug Fixes

    • Added cleanup for deprecated minion keys

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2025

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-22237 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentialy performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regenration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@danmanor danmanor requested a review from omertuc November 16, 2025 12:36
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request extends Kubernetes Pod support in the etcd encoding layer and implements IP address migration for Pod status fields during cluster IP reconfiguration, including minion resource cleanup and expanded YAML file scanning for configuration updates.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Pod type support in etcd encoding
src/etcd_encoding.rs
Adds Pod to imports, introduces PodWithMeta type via macro, and wires Pod through decode/encode paths for Kubernetes type handling.
Pod IP status fixing orchestration
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs
Integrates two sequential post-processing calls: fix_pods_status() and delete_minions_if_exist() after etcd member fixes.
Pod IP migration and minion cleanup
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs
Implements fix_pods_status() to conditionally update Pod status IP fields (podIP, hostIP, podIPs, hostIPs) and delete_minions_if_exist() to remove minion keys, both with parallel processing.
Expanded resource scanning
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs
Adds quorum-restore-pod.yaml glob pattern to YAML file processing chain for IP restoration coverage.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Orchestrator as IP Rename<br/>Orchestrator
    participant EtcdRename as etcd_rename<br/>Module
    participant Etcd as In-Memory<br/>Etcd
    
    Orchestrator->>EtcdRename: fix_pods_status(etcd_client,<br/>original_ip, new_ip)
    Note over EtcdRename: List all Pod resources
    EtcdRename->>Etcd: Read Pods
    Note over EtcdRename: For each Pod (in parallel):<br/>- Check status IPs match original_ip<br/>- Update podIP, hostIP, podIPs, hostIPs
    EtcdRename->>Etcd: Write updated Pod resources
    
    Orchestrator->>EtcdRename: delete_minions_if_exist(etcd_client)
    Note over EtcdRename: List minion keys
    EtcdRename->>Etcd: Query for minions
    alt Minions exist
        EtcdRename->>Etcd: Delete minion entries
    end
    
    EtcdRename-->>Orchestrator: Complete
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

  • Pod status field mutation logic: Verify that the conditional IP replacement in fix_pods_status() correctly targets all four status fields (podIP, hostIP, podIPs, hostIPs) and handles both singular and plural forms appropriately
  • Parallel processing correctness: Review the join_all() usage for potential race conditions or incomplete error propagation across parallel Pod updates
  • Minion deletion safety: Ensure delete_minions_if_exist() gracefully handles scenarios where minions may not exist and that deletion doesn't affect other cluster resources
  • Type integration: Confirm PodWithMeta type integration with existing encode/decode serialization paths and that Pod is properly handled alongside ConfigMap, Node, and Secret types

Suggested labels

ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • mresvanis
  • tsorya

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title references a Jira ticket but is vague about the actual changes; it does not clearly describe what 'IP Configuration flow' changes are being implemented. Consider revising the title to be more specific about the key changes, such as 'Add Pod IP status updates and minion cleanup for IP configuration flow' to make it clearer what is being implemented.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mresvanis and tsorya November 16, 2025 12:36
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danmanor

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2025

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-22237 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentialy performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regenration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

  • Added Kubernetes Pod support to resource handling and serialization.

  • Pod status IP fields now updated during IP migration operations.

  • Improvements

  • Enhanced IP renaming process with automatic minion cleanup.

  • Extended restore configuration file processing for improved data recovery.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@danmanor danmanor force-pushed the remove-pods-nodes-ip-change branch from f3c7183 to 8518d0a Compare November 16, 2025 12:39
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2025

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-22237 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentially performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regeneration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

This PR also adds the path to the quorum-restore-pod so its ips will be changed as well

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

  • Added Kubernetes Pod support to resource handling and serialization.

  • Pod status IP fields now updated during IP migration operations.

  • Improvements

  • Enhanced IP renaming process with automatic minion cleanup.

  • Extended restore configuration file processing for improved data recovery.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (1)

11-17: Extending filesystem IP fixes to quorum-restore pod manifests is reasonable

Including **/restore-etcd-pod/quorum-restore-pod.yaml in the glob chain keeps the behavior consistent with the other etcd pod artifacts and ensures restore-related pod YAMLs get their IPs updated as well.

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)

148-160: Sequencing pod status updates and minion cleanup after etcd member update makes sense

Calling fix_pods_status after fix_etcd_member ensures Pod status fields reflect the new IPs, and delete_minions_if_exist then drops the old node objects so they can be regenerated. In the dual‑stack path this runs once per IP pair and remains idempotent (second and subsequent minion deletions see no keys), so the flow is consistent for both single‑ and dual‑stack SNO IP changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c4fdfc and f3c7183.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/etcd_encoding.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • telco5g-konflux (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (3)
  • fix_pods_status (600-699)
  • original_ip (569-569)
  • delete_minions_if_exist (701-706)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (2)
src/ocp_postprocess/cluster_domain_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (1)
  • file_utils (230-235)
src/file_utils.rs (1)
  • globvec (26-42)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)
src/k8s_etcd.rs (3)
  • key (303-303)
  • get_etcd_json (316-327)
  • put_etcd_yaml (329-334)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Rust
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs

[error] 667-700: Rust formatting check failed. Run 'cargo fmt' to format code as required. Differences detected in the block around joining etcd client keys and subsequent processing.


[error] 1-1: Command failed with exit code 2.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Red Hat Konflux / recert-4-21-on-pull-request
🔇 Additional comments (3)
telco5g-konflux (1)

1-1: ---

Verify the submodule commit contains the expected changes.

The submodule pointer has been updated to a new commit (dd42e3c0b63a6f9231c0d117b9c915c0ace1e71b). Based on the PR objectives and AI summary, this commit should include Pod support in the etcd encoding, pod status IP address updates, minion cleanup logic, and filesystem YAML pattern expansions for the IP Configuration flow.

Verify manually that the referenced commit aligns with these expectations and contains no unintended changes.

src/etcd_encoding.rs (1)

8-9: Pod support in etcd (de)serialization looks consistent with existing patterns

Importing Pod, defining PodWithMeta, and wiring the "Pod" arms into decode/encode mirror how other core types (ConfigMap/Node/Secret) are handled, so Pod resources should now round‑trip correctly through Unknown without affecting unknown kinds behavior.

Also applies to: 61-61, 82-97, 111-128

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)

600-706: Code verified; no outstanding issues remain

The fix_pods_status and delete_minions_if_exist functions are correctly implemented:

  • Status IP mutation targets only known Pod fields (podIP, hostIP, podIPs, hostIPs) with exact string matching, safely handling both string and object array entries.
  • Concurrent mutation via join_all is consistent with the codebase pattern, writing back only on actual changes.
  • delete_minions_if_exist mirrors existing prefix-based deletion and is idempotent.

Code formatting is clean with no trailing whitespace or indentation issues detected. All logic and structure are sound.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2025

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-22237 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentially performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regeneration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

This PR also adds the path to the quorum-restore-pod so its ips will be changed as well

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

  • Added Kubernetes Pod support to resource handling and serialization.

  • Improvements

  • Pod status IP fields now updated during IP migration operations.

  • Enhanced IP renaming process with automatic minion cleanup.

  • Extended restore file scanning to include additional restore pod manifests.

  • Chores

  • Updated an external submodule pointer to a newer commit.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)

695-700: Consider optimizing for dual-stack scenarios.

The function correctly deletes all minion keys to allow node regeneration. However, in dual-stack mode, this function is called once per IP pair. The second call becomes a no-op since the first call already deleted the keys.

To optimize, consider calling delete_minions_if_exist once after all IP pairs are processed in fix_etcd_resources_dual_stack (in ip_rename.rs), rather than within each fix_etcd_resources_for_ip_pair call. The current implementation is correct and safe, just not optimally efficient.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3c7183 and 8518d0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/etcd_encoding.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • telco5g-konflux (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • telco5g-konflux
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)
src/k8s_etcd.rs (3)
  • key (303-303)
  • get_etcd_json (316-327)
  • put_etcd_yaml (329-334)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (3)
  • fix_pods_status (600-693)
  • original_ip (569-569)
  • delete_minions_if_exist (695-700)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Red Hat Konflux / recert-4-21-on-pull-request
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/etcd_encoding.rs (1)

8-8: LGTM! Pod support correctly added.

The Pod type support follows the established pattern for other Kubernetes resources (ConfigMap, Node, Secret, etc.) and is properly integrated into both decode and encode functions.

Also applies to: 61-61, 93-93, 116-117

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (2)

602-668: Well-structured IP replacement logic.

The helper correctly handles all four Pod status IP fields (podIP, hostIP, podIPs, hostIPs). The defensive handling of both string and object formats in the array fields is good practice, though the Kubernetes API spec defines podIPs/hostIPs as arrays of objects with an "ip" field.


670-693: LGTM! Efficient parallel pod processing.

The function correctly iterates over all pods, applies IP updates only when needed, and processes pods concurrently using join_all. The conditional write-back optimization avoids unnecessary etcd writes.

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)

152-158: LGTM! Logical placement in the IP rename flow.

The two new steps are correctly positioned after all resource fixes and the etcd member update. This ensures pod statuses are updated and the old node is cleaned up for regeneration as the final steps of the IP configuration flow.

… IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentialy performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regenration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.
@danmanor danmanor force-pushed the remove-pods-nodes-ip-change branch from 78e3fff to 826b003 Compare November 23, 2025 07:25
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 23, 2025

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-22237 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

IP configuration is a new flow which will be introduced soon in LCA. The flow essentially performs IP change in SNO clusters. To perform the change correctly, we need to change the IP in the pods statuses as well and delete the old node for regeneration. IBU doesn't require this logic because it changes the hostname and in that case recert deletes the pods and node anyway.

This PR also adds the path to the quorum-restore-pod so its ips will be changed as well

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

  • Added Pod support to Kubernetes type handling in the etcd layer

  • Enhanced pod status IP field updates during IP address transitions, including podIP, hostIP, and podIPs fields

  • Expanded YAML file pattern coverage for the restoration process

  • Bug Fixes

  • Added cleanup for deprecated minion keys

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)

695-700: LGTM! Minion deletion logic is correct.

The function properly lists and deletes all minion keys. The naming (delete_minions_if_exist) correctly signals that it's safe to call even if no minions are present.

As with the pod status update, the past review comment "Also minions" questioning whether they're deleted elsewhere is addressed by the PR's context: the IP configuration flow requires deleting the old node for regeneration, unlike the IBU flow which handles it differently.

Note: The verification request in the first file's review will confirm these operations don't conflict with other code paths.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)

152-158: Consider consolidating pod and minion operations for dual-stack.

In dual-stack configurations, fix_etcd_resources_for_ip_pair is invoked once per IP (lines 197-202). This means fix_pods_status will scan all pods twice (once for each IP replacement), and delete_minions_if_exist will be called twice (though the second call is a no-op).

For better performance in dual-stack scenarios, consider refactoring to:

  1. Collect all IP replacement pairs first
  2. Scan pods once and apply all IP replacements in a single pass
  3. Delete minions once after all IP updates

Example approach:

// In fix_etcd_resources_dual_stack, after the main loop:
fix_pods_status_dual_stack(etcd_client, original_ips, new_ips).await?;
delete_minions_if_exist(etcd_client).await?;

However, the current implementation is functionally correct and the performance impact is likely minimal for SNO clusters.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8518d0a and 826b003.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/etcd_encoding.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/filesystem_rename.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (3)
  • fix_pods_status (600-693)
  • original_ip (569-569)
  • delete_minions_if_exist (695-700)
src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)
src/k8s_etcd.rs (3)
  • key (303-303)
  • get_etcd_json (316-327)
  • put_etcd_yaml (329-334)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Red Hat Konflux / recert-4-21-on-pull-request
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/etcd_encoding.rs (1)

8-8: LGTM!

Pod support is correctly added to the encoding/decoding layer following the established pattern for other Kubernetes resource types. This enables the IP rename flow to properly handle Pod resources stored in etcd.

Also applies to: 61-61, 93-93, 117-117

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename/etcd_rename.rs (1)

600-693: LGTM! Pod status IP replacement logic is sound.

The implementation correctly:

  • Handles multiple Pod status IP field formats (podIP, hostIP, podIPs as strings or objects, hostIPs)
  • Only mutates fields matching the original IP (conditional replacement)
  • Gracefully handles missing fields with if let Some patterns
  • Processes pods in parallel via join_all for performance
  • Only writes back to etcd when changes are detected

Regarding the past review comment "Don't we delete all pods?" - the PR description clarifies that the IBU flow deletes pods (when hostname changes), but this IP configuration flow does not, hence these status updates are necessary.

src/ocp_postprocess/ip_rename.rs (1)

152-158: Review comment verification reveals inaccuracy in the stated concern.

Based on code analysis:

  1. IP rename flow (lines 152–158 in ip_rename.rs) explicitly calls:

    • delete_minions_if_exist() — deletes all minion objects
    • fix_pods_status() — updates pod status IPs (no deletion)
  2. Cluster domain rename flow (line 221 in cluster_domain_rename.rs) calls:

    • delete_resources() — deletes controller revisions, pod network connectivity checks, configmaps, and API request counts (filtered by specific namespaces/names)
  3. Key finding: These operations target entirely different resources:

    • IP flow deletes minions (legacy Kubernetes resource type)
    • Cluster domain flow deletes controller revisions, checkpoints, and lock objects (NOT minions, NOT pods)
    • delete_resources is not called in the IP rename flow (verified by grep)

Conclusion: The review comment's premise ("IP configuration flow does not [delete resources]") contradicts the actual code. The IP flow does delete minions, and there is no conflict because each flow properly handles its own required cleanup on different resource types. The stated concern is not substantiated.

@omertuc
Copy link
Member

omertuc commented Nov 24, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Nov 24, 2025
@danmanor
Copy link
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@danmanor: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/4.14-images
  • ci/prow/4.15-images
  • ci/prow/4.16-images
  • ci/prow/4.17-images
  • ci/prow/baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename
  • ci/prow/cargo-check
  • ci/prow/cargo-clippy
  • ci/prow/cargo-test
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial
  • ci/prow/images
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-4.14-images
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-4.15-images
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-4.16-images
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-4.17-images
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-cargo-check
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-cargo-clippy
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-cargo-test
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial
  • pull-ci-rh-ecosystem-edge-recert-main-images
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@danmanor
Copy link
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@danmanor: Overrode contexts on behalf of danmanor: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@danmanor
Copy link
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@danmanor: Overrode contexts on behalf of danmanor: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 6beeff0 into rh-ecosystem-edge:main Nov 25, 2025
17 checks passed
@danmanor
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@danmanor: new pull request created: #789

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@danmanor: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel 826b003 link unknown /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial 826b003 link unknown /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial
ci/prow/baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename 826b003 link unknown /test baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants