-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Add ELIXIR BioHackrXiv paper #33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update the number of filtered workflows to match the text row 166:
"The initial dataset from WorkflowHub consisted of 1,349 workflows, which was reduced to 295 candidates..."
Add number of curated workflows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update also needed for RSEc tools and bioconda recipes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After Filtering, it should be 3,262 tools, not 5,094
Co-authored-by: paulzierep <paul.zierep@googlemail.com>
|
|
||
| ### bio.tools Tools Curation | ||
|
|
||
| The **bio.tools** (via RSEc-Atlas) yielded **over 4,000 potential microbiome tools** after filtering. Due to the **sheer volume** and **time constraints**, a **community-driven curation process** was initiated, with contributions expected from the microbiome research community in the coming months. To date, **201** tools have been reviewed with **169** tools confirmed as directly relevant to microbiome research. Additionally, the **integration of missing tools** identified from other platforms (e.g., WorkflowHub) could not be completed within the BioHackathon timeline, as the process required more extensive validation and coordination. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At line 162, updated numbers should be "over 3,000 potential microbiome tools" not 4,00
Preview: http://preview.biohackrxiv.org/papers/3b0ebb21-79f2-4cd1-b7c3-26c0d4a12887/paper.pdf