Restore rp_display_suite_test_file and fix bug with rp_dir_level

[ramir-dn]

Hellow,

This PR handles 2 things:

1. Fixes an issue with rp_dir_level: in _remove_root_dirs, the loop that handles the ROOT node only handled it first child and called return.
2. Add back the support for rp_display_suite_test_file. It depends on rp_dir_level in a way that if the file name appears deep in the hierarchy, it will be kept and not deleted. The default is True to keep the current behavior, but if set to False, and the rp_dir_level is deep enough, the file name will be removed too, and will be left with suites and tests only in the hierarchy.

[ramir-dn]

Hello @HardNorth , will be great if you could take a look and review this. If that's fine, it will be great to have a new release with this change. thanks!

[ramir-dn]

Hi @HardNorth, anything I can do to promote this PR? thanks you!

[HardNorth]

@ramir-dn, Thanks for the suggestion, but looks like you checked out broken code which was in develop branch for one day. Please pull the latest changes.

[ramir-dn]

Thanks @HardNorth , updated my branch. Can you test again please?

[ramir-dn]

@HardNorth , I fixed the missing parameter. I am not sure what happened in my local tox run but it didn't detect it. Can you please rerun?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.22%. Comparing base (1bcb242) to head (7b6cec8).
Report is 17 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pytest_reportportal/service.py	81.48%	5 Missing ⚠️
pytest_reportportal/config.py	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #383      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    68.35%   68.22%   -0.13%     
===========================================
  Files            6        6              
  Lines          970      982      +12     
===========================================
+ Hits           663      670       +7     
- Misses         307      312       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.22% <80.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[HardNorth]

LGTM

[ramir-dn]

Thanks @HardNorth!
Can you tell when can I expect a new release with this fix?

[HardNorth]

@ramir-dn Please wait for a day or two. I have to rework your code and add tests.

[HardNorth]

@ramir-dn Please use this version: https://github.com/reportportal/agent-python-pytest/releases/tag/5.4.6
I renamed your flag to rp_hierarchy_test_file, to conform with other flags, and removed any chain with rp_hierarchy_dirs_level flag, so you can use it independently.

[ramir-dn]

That was quick! Thanks @HardNorth!