RDKB-61958: Parodus-Start coverity issues fix

[im1308]

RDKB-61958: Parodus-Start coverity issues fix

Reason for change: High and medium risk Parodus Start coverity issues fix
Test Procedure: Build should be successful and the regression test should also succeed.
Risks: High
Priority: P1

Below referred coverity Issues fixed.

[github-actions]

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[GoutamD2905]

Before merging, I have a few questions:

1. Is this a Bug or a User Story (US)?
2. If it is a User Story:
   • Please list all dependent PRs from other components, if any.
   • The commit message must include both the User Story ticket and the Subtask ticket.
   • All changes related to the User Story must be squashed and merged in a single commit.
   • Do not raise pull requests for partial User Story changes.
   • Has the code development for the User Story been completed?
     • If yes, please share the Gerrit topic or list all dependent PRs across components, including any meta-layer changes.
3. Is there a validation log available in the Jira ticket for verifying builds with the updated generic-srcrev.inc across all platforms?
   • If yes, please share the links to the validation comments.

[mhughesacn]

The fossid error can be ignored because it is match to our own code: fossid tells you the file with the match (1) and where the match is (i.e. file and repo with version info) (2) and (3) like this:
(1) source/parodusStart/start_parodus.c' (Match: (2) rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/1, 1786 lines, url: (3) https://code.rdkcentral.com/r/plugins/gitiles/rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/+archive/RDKB-RELEASE-TEST-DUNFELL-1.tar.gz, file: source/parodusStart/start_parodus.c

Sriram Giridharan (Comcast) was working on excluding these but I don't know the current status of that task.

[im1308]

The fossid error can be ignored because it is match to our own code: fossid tells you the file with the match (1) and where the match is (i.e. file and repo with version info) (2) and (3) like this: (1) source/parodusStart/start_parodus.c' (Match: (2) rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/1, 1786 lines, url: (3) https://code.rdkcentral.com/r/plugins/gitiles/rdkb/components/generic/startParodus/+archive/RDKB-RELEASE-TEST-DUNFELL-1.tar.gz, file: source/parodusStart/start_parodus.c

Sriram Giridharan (Comcast) was working on excluding these but I don't know the current status of that task.

Thanks. we will ignore this error.

[im1308]

Before merging, I have a few questions:

1. Is this a Bug or a User Story (US)? - Yes

2. If it is a User Story:

   • Please list all dependent PRs from other components, if any. - No dependent PRs.

   • The commit message must include both the User Story ticket and the Subtask ticket.

   • All changes related to the User Story must be squashed and merged in a single commit.

   • Do not raise pull requests for partial User Story changes.

   • Has the code development for the User Story been completed? Yes

     • If yes, please share the Gerrit topic or list all dependent PRs across components, including any meta-layer changes.

3. Is there a validation log available in the Jira ticket for verifying builds with the updated generic-srcrev.inc across all platforms?

   • If yes, please share the links to the validation comments.
     Comments Addressed. Please find the logs location below.
     https://ccp.sys.comcast.net/secure/attachment/13391157/coverity_logs.txt

[im1308]

Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

recheck

[im1308]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[im1308]

recheck

[apattu200]

Looks good to me.