Skip to content

deploy demo app#69

Merged
qasmi merged 2 commits intomainfrom
demo
Dec 8, 2025
Merged

deploy demo app#69
qasmi merged 2 commits intomainfrom
demo

Conversation

@qasmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@qasmi qasmi commented Dec 8, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@my-helper-agent my-helper-agent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1️⃣ Real-Time Diff Summary

Kind Namespace Name Action
Namespace (cluster-scoped) demo-oss-japan CREATE
Service demo-oss-japan game-2048-dao-2048 CREATE
Deployment demo-oss-japan game-2048-dao-2048 CREATE
Application argocd game-2048 CREATE
AppProject argocd demo-oss-japan CREATE

2️⃣ Impact Prediction

  • Namespace demo-oss-japan will be created; no conflict detected.
  • Deployment "game-2048-dao-2048" pods require scheduling on nodes with label role: storage and toleration for NoSchedule taint with key role=storage. Live cluster nodes do not have role: storage label; this will cause pods to be unschedulable, remaining in Pending state.
  • The Service of type LoadBalancer will create an external endpoint as expected if LoadBalancer controller is configured.
  • The ArgoCD Application and AppProject resources will be created and tracked by argocd in namespace argocd.
  • No resource quota in target namespace, so no quota conflicts.
  • No live namespace "demo-oss-japan" detected (Kubernetes API returns NotFound), creating it as required.

3️⃣ Risk Analysis

  • Problem: Deployment pods require nodeSelector role: storage, but no nodes with matching label exist in the cluster.
    Impact: Pods will remain unschedulable and fail to run.
    Mitigation: Add nodes with label role: storage or remove/change nodeSelector and tolerations to match existing nodes.

  • Problem: Kyverno policy "require-run-as-nonroot" violated: container runs as root user by default.
    Impact: Deployment creation blocked by policy enforcement, preventing pod startup.
    Mitigation: Modify Helm chart or values to add securityContext.runAsNonRoot: true to pod and container specs.

  • Problem: Kyverno policy "require-requests-limits" violated: container resource requests and limits are missing.
    Impact: Deployment creation blocked or unstable resource usage due to missing resource constraints.
    Mitigation: Specify CPU and memory requests and limits in Helm values or chart defaults.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@my-helper-agent my-helper-agent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1️⃣ Real-Time Diff Summary

Kind Namespace Name Action
Namespace demo-oss-japan demo-oss-japan CREATE
Service demo-oss-japan game-2048-dao-2048 CREATE
Deployment demo-oss-japan game-2048-dao-2048 CREATE
Application argocd game-2048 CREATE
AppProject argocd demo-oss-japan CREATE

2️⃣ Impact Prediction

  • Namespace demo-oss-japan will be created successfully.
  • Helm chart dao-2048 version 1.2.1 will deploy a Deployment and a LoadBalancer Service in the demo-oss-japan namespace.
  • The Deployment will run a single replica of the ghcr.io/daocloud/dao-2048:v1.2.1 container image with the specified CPU and memory requests and limits.
  • The Pod will run with runAsNonRoot: true security context.
  • The Service of type LoadBalancer will expose the application on port 80 with potential provisioning delay for external IP.
  • The workload is schedulable on existing cluster nodes as nodes are Ready without taints preventing scheduling.
  • No ResourceQuota is present in the target namespace, so no quota constraint checks are needed.
  • No ConfigMap, Secret, or PVC dependencies found for this deployment.

3️⃣ Risk Analysis

No blocking risks or misconfigurations detected.

@qasmi qasmi merged commit 4d90411 into main Dec 8, 2025
1 check passed
@qasmi qasmi deleted the demo branch December 8, 2025 04:09
@qasmi qasmi restored the demo branch December 8, 2025 04:16
@qasmi qasmi deleted the demo branch December 8, 2025 05:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants