Skip to content

Comments

feat: direct_url#944

Open
sbidoul wants to merge 5 commits intopypa:mainfrom
sbidoul:direct_url-sbi
Open

feat: direct_url#944
sbidoul wants to merge 5 commits intopypa:mainfrom
sbidoul:direct_url-sbi

Conversation

@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

@sbidoul sbidoul commented Oct 12, 2025

I'm opening this to show what direct_url.json support could look like, in the same style as what I did for pylock in #900.

If maintainers agree with the approach, I'll be happy to move this forward.

Towards #701.

@sbidoul sbidoul marked this pull request as draft October 12, 2025 13:17
@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

I'm fine with the approach. Not sure if there's anything to borrow/share with packaging.pylock since similar data is in both specs (by design).

@pradyunsg @henryiii @notatallshaw any opinions?

@sbidoul sbidoul force-pushed the direct_url-sbi branch 3 times, most recently from 941c15c to c6e7e4a Compare November 8, 2025 13:48
@sbidoul sbidoul marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2026 18:38
@sbidoul sbidoul changed the title [DRAFT] direct_url direct_url Feb 21, 2026
@sbidoul sbidoul force-pushed the direct_url-sbi branch 2 times, most recently from bcb9c3a to ca29d5e Compare February 22, 2026 13:46
@sbidoul
Copy link
Member Author

sbidoul commented Feb 22, 2026

Not sure if there's anything to borrow/share with packaging.pylock since similar data is in both specs (by design).

I don't think so. The concepts are close, but the data structures are different.

This is now complete and ready for review.

@henryiii henryiii changed the title direct_url feat: direct_url Feb 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants