Neo io

[BalzaniEdoardo]

Start off a neo-io support.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.82512% with 64 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pynapple/io/interface_neo.py	89.50%	32 Missing and 19 partials ⚠️
pynapple/io/interface_neurosuite.py	91.97%	8 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pynapple/io/misc.py	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pynapple/io/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pynapple/io/misc.py	61.26% <50.00%> (-1.13%)	⬇️
pynapple/io/interface_neurosuite.py	91.97% <91.97%> (ø)
pynapple/io/interface_neo.py	89.50% <89.50%> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[wulfdewolf]

Looks good to me!

My comments are mostly for the user guide: small language comments and raising the question whether we should focus only on LFP or just saying we can load any "raw" data, which I think is better.

I managed to run it locally and it runs very smoothly, even when the data is not even downloaded locally but on some network-mounted drive.

The tests look comprehensive. I'm imagining once people start using this things might pop-up, and we might have to add tests to catch them, but I think it wouldn't be very practical trying to predict them now.

[BalzaniEdoardo]

Looking very neat

[BalzaniEdoardo]

I think this init does too much, you should probably split it in a bunch of function calls that do stuff like crating the offset array etc. In this way it will be easier to unit test these too

[h-mayorquin]

Related effort:

#563