Open
Conversation
Member
|
Sweet! Taking a look now (though I don't think I can do a proper review, getting too late for that =D ) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 6 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially addresses #927.
I had a play around with this this evening. The code was already pretty optimised, but I thought I could potentially squeeze a little more juice out of it, so I rearranged a little bit. Not sure the juice was worth the squeeze in this instance? I got about 5% out if we just look at the point estimates
Note: I didn't run the full test suite. I just ran the benchmarks.