Skip to content

Draft: Use new rng in more places#317

Open
JamesMcClung wants to merge 4 commits intopsc-code:mainfrom
JamesMcClung:pr/use-rng
Open

Draft: Use new rng in more places#317
JamesMcClung wants to merge 4 commits intopsc-code:mainfrom
JamesMcClung:pr/use-rng

Conversation

@JamesMcClung
Copy link
Collaborator

Transition away from using random(). Needs more testing.

James added 4 commits June 16, 2025 09:26
could be further streamlined

This changes the behavior of RngC: it can now return 0 instead of 1.
However, it seems like this is actually the correct behavior.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant