fix(compile): use exact navigation for alternation branches and definition bodies #234
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes the "search scope family of bugs" where the search loop operates below the level of alternation/backtracking semantics, causing cursor advancement to "consume" positions before other branches can try them.
Nav::to_exact()) - branches match at current position onlyNav::StayExact- named definitions match at cursor position, caller owns searchThis ensures that when
[(A) (B)]is matched whereA = (function_call)andB = (juxt_function_call):Previously, A's search loop could advance past positions that B should have tried.
Test plan
[(A) (B)]returns 2 matches