Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @julianuziemblo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly expands the test coverage for Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces new tests for special ioctl calls, specifically SIOCGIFCONF, and a Python test for route management. The changes include adding the new test files to the Makefile and the test configuration YAML. Overall, the new tests are a valuable addition, but there are a few areas for improvement regarding error handling in the GET_IFADDRS macro, clarity in a test case name and assertion, and consistency in ioctl call arguments.
Unit Test Results9 553 tests +28 8 961 ✅ +28 52m 44s ⏱️ +7s Results for commit ceb4510. ± Comparison against base commit 6857efb. This pull request removes 99 and adds 127 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
julianuziemblo
force-pushed
the
julianuziemblo/RTOS-1205
branch
2 times, most recently
from
856cbd5 to
a60cd52
Compare
julianuziemblo
changed the title
julianuziemblo
force-pushed
the
julianuziemblo/RTOS-1205
branch
3 times, most recently
from
19a8e38 to
56bbbed
Compare
JIRA: RTOS-508
Nested ioctls are those that pass in a struct with sub-pointer(s) to arbitrary memory, as we have to handle them differently to pass that memory. For now, only some socket-related ioctls are nested, so the test is run only for targets that support lwip. JIRA: RTOS-1014
julianuziemblo
force-pushed
the
julianuziemblo/RTOS-1205
branch
from
56bbbed to
ceb4510
Compare
2 participants
Description
Special-case ioctls are those which pass a structure with pointers or flexible array members to the syscall. For now this is only:
SIOCGIFCONF,SIOCADDRTandSIOCDELRT.Motivation and Context
Types of changes
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist:
Special treatment