Skip to content

micropython: change approach to executing tests repl#335

Draft
mateusz-bloch wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
mateusz-bloch/repl_tests_with_kwargs
Draft

micropython: change approach to executing tests repl#335
mateusz-bloch wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
mateusz-bloch/repl_tests_with_kwargs

Conversation

@mateusz-bloch
Copy link
Member

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Already covered by automatic testing.
  • New test added: (add PR link here).
  • Tested by hand on: (list targets here).

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing linter checks and tests passed.
  • My changes generate no new compilation warnings for any of the targets.

Special treatment

  • This PR needs additional PRs to work (list the PRs, preferably in merge-order).
  • I will merge this PR by myself when appropriate.

@mateusz-bloch mateusz-bloch changed the title micropython: change approach to executing tests micropython: change approach to executing tests repl Mar 11, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Unit Test Results

7 958 tests  ±0   7 416 ✅ ±0   40m 30s ⏱️ - 1m 53s
  470 suites ±0     542 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 022827d. ± Comparison against base commit 9290d42.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@mateusz-bloch mateusz-bloch force-pushed the mateusz-bloch/repl_tests_with_kwargs branch from a664cb0 to 022827d Compare February 19, 2025 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant