Skip to content

Conversation

@danieleongari
Copy link

@danieleongari danieleongari commented Jun 28, 2021

This fix operates on top of #6.
Some of these overlap with the corrections in #5.

The problems I'm fixing here come from very basic parsing of the databese:

  • Missing geometry xyz file for a certain fragment's label
  • Mismatching number of atoms in the header of the XYZ
  • rename some databases where the suffix _ALL is not consistent: MB08-165_ALL should be MB08-165 because there are no other databases, and MetalsEE_Por21 should be MetalsEE_Por21_ALL because it is a combination of the systems in the PorBE10 and PorSS1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant