Open
Conversation
Attempting to take Reviewer 1's comments into account to allow a more direct comparison of the total number vaccinated under each strategy but also the number by serostatus.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here I've split the marginal effect of additional sensitivity up (A) so that all seropositives are above the axis and all seronegatives below. This means that the "total" lines make no sense on the axes given, so they've been pushed into a new subplot (B) which has the same extents as the cost limit plot (C). Doing this has meant linetype is no longer necessary for differentiating the sensitivities, so the lines are now alpha'ed just like the fill in subplot A and the legend now has less duplication.