Skip to content

Conversation

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Berezovskyi <andriib@kth.se>
@axelreichwein
Copy link
Member

when you say: "primary goal of OSLC Core 3.0 was upwards compatibility with OSLC 2.0" -> you probably mean backwards compatibility with OSLC 2.0?

axelreichwein
axelreichwein previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2021
@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@axelreichwein I agree this sounds wrong. As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_compatibility, we don't expect OSLC 2 servers to accept LDP-rich input crafted for OSLC 3 servers.

@jamsden could you please check this and edit this PR as necessary? Web edits can be done via https://github.com/oslc-op/website/edit/b-oslc-core-os/content/news/2021/oslc-core-os.md?pr=%2Foslc-op%2Fwebsite%2Fpull%2F297

Thanks to both of you!

@jamsden
Copy link
Member

jamsden commented Sep 13, 2021 via email

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@jamsden @axelreichwein do we still want to publish this as a blog post? I would like to publish it before the OSLCfest. Core PN will take us 2-3 weeks to get out.

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@jamsden strange we never published this. Should we go ahead?

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

I now recall we were waiting for the PN publication.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Jim Amsden seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants