Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces new controllers and services to manage component libraries and user components within a material center context. It adds CRUD endpoints and logic for component libraries, including bulk and bundle creation for user components with robust file handling and validation. The routing configuration is extended to expose these new API endpoints. Additionally, configuration files are updated for CORS support, a new development server port, and changes to AI model endpoints. Enum values and default service ports are also updated to reflect new requirements. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Router
participant ComponentController
participant ComponentLibraryService
participant UserComponentController
participant UserComponentService
Client->>Router: POST /component-library
Router->>ComponentController: create()
ComponentController->>ComponentLibraryService: create()
ComponentLibraryService-->>ComponentController: result
ComponentController-->>Client: response
Client->>Router: POST /component/bundle/create
Router->>UserComponentController: bundleCreate()
UserComponentController->>UserComponentService: bundleCreate(fileStream)
UserComponentService->>UserComponentService: validate & parse file
UserComponentService->>UserComponentService: bulkComponentCreate()
UserComponentService-->>UserComponentController: result
UserComponentController-->>Client: response
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
package.json (1)
19-19: Ensure port consistency between dev and debug modesThe development server port has been changed to 7020, but the debug port on line 20 still uses 7011. Consider whether these should be aligned for consistency.
"dev": "egg-bin dev --port 7020", - "debug": "egg-bin debug --port 7011", + "debug": "egg-bin debug --port 7020",app/router/materialCenter/base.ts (1)
73-73: Format consistently with other routesAdd space after the comma for readability and consistency with codebase standards.
-subRouter.post('/component/bundle/create',controller.materialCenter.userComponents.bundleCreate); +subRouter.post('/component/bundle/create', controller.materialCenter.userComponents.bundleCreate);app/controller/material-center/ComponentLibrary.ts (2)
21-24: Consider adding input validation and error handling.Currently, the
createmethod directly consumes the request body and delegates creation to the service. For robust APIs, consider validating the input (e.g., usingthis.ctx.validate(...)) and capturing any errors thrown by the service to provide a safe, informative response.
49-52: Add error handling for the delete operation.Similar to the update method, the
deletemethod directly destructuresidand calls the service. Adding suppression for missing or invalididparameters and gracefully handling service errors can strengthen the controller’s reliability.app/service/material-center/UserComponents.ts (2)
85-122: Review the utility ofcomponentLibraryListResultand handle array property merging carefully.
let componentLibraryListResult: any = [];is assigned but never returned or used later. Remove it if not needed.- Converting
component.componentarrays to a comma-separated string (lines 92-94) might cause ambiguity or data loss. Consider storing them as arrays in the database or normalizing their structure at creation time.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 103-107: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
177-178: Ensuresnippetsis defined before iterating.Since you already check
snippets != null && snippets.length != 0, optional chaining might reduce nesting while avoiding runtime errors. For instance:if (snippets?.length) { snippets.forEach((snippetItem) => { // ... }); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 178-178: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)app/controller/material-center/ComponentLibrary.ts(1 hunks)app/controller/material-center/UserComponents.ts(1 hunks)app/lib/enum.ts(1 hunks)app/router/materialCenter/base.ts(1 hunks)app/service/app-center/appSchema.ts(2 hunks)app/service/material-center/ComponentLibrary.ts(1 hunks)app/service/material-center/UserComponents.ts(1 hunks)config/config.default.ts(2 hunks)config/config.local.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
app/controller/material-center/ComponentLibrary.ts (1)
app/lib/interface.ts (1)
I_CreateComponentLibrary(445-460)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
app/service/material-center/UserComponents.ts
[error] 103-107: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 178-178: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.vscode/settings.json (1)
6-6: Addition of newline at end of file is a good practice.Adding a newline at the end of the file improves POSIX compatibility and prevents potential editor warnings. No action needed.
app/lib/enum.ts (1)
292-292:Details
✅ Verification successful
Update model name to match API endpoint changes
The ERNIE_BOT_TURBO model name has been updated from 'ERNIE-Bot-turbo' to 'ERNIE-4.0-8K'. This aligns with the updated API endpoint mentioned in the summary, but we should verify that all references to this model are updated consistently.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any remaining references to the old model name rg "ERNIE-Bot-turbo" --type ts --type js # Check if the model is used consistently in configurations and API calls rg -A 3 "ERNIE_BOT_TURBO" --type ts --type jsLength of output: 1061
Consistent usage of updated model name verified
All instances of the model now reference
"ERNIE-4.0-8K", and no lingering references to the old"ERNIE-Bot-turbo"were found. The enumeration inapp/lib/enum.tsand its usage in bothconfig/config.default.tsandapp/service/app-center/aiChat.tsare updated accordingly.app/service/app-center/appSchema.ts (2)
25-26: LGTM - New package information map entryThe execMap has been correctly extended with a new 'packages' entry that maps to the getPackages method.
57-63:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Ensure error handling when executing schema functions
With the addition of the new 'packages' entry to execMap, verify that error handling in this loop is sufficient for the new method. Currently, if a function returns an error, it returns early, which might prevent processing other schema components.
Consider a more robust approach where errors in one function don't prevent the entire schema from being built. This is related to the implementation of the new getPackages method.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how errors are handled in the AppSchema class rg -A 3 -B 3 "error" app/service/app-center/appSchema.tsLength of output: 246
Revisit Error-Handling Strategy in Schema Function Execution
The loop at lines 57–63 in
app/service/app-center/appSchema.tsreturns immediately when any function reports an error. With the newly added'packages'entry (i.e., thegetPackagesmethod) in theexecMap, please verify whether this early return is the intended behavior. If the goal is to build the complete schema even when one function fails, consider altering the current approach to aggregate errors (or at least log them) rather than stopping execution immediately.
- File:
app/service/app-center/appSchema.ts(lines 57–63)- Issue: Early exit on error may prevent other valid schema components from being processed, which is particularly relevant for the new
'packages'functionality.- Suggestion: Review whether the early return is the best strategy or if a more robust error-handling mechanism should be implemented to allow partial schema construction while properly managing errors.
app/controller/material-center/ComponentLibrary.ts (1)
38-42: Verify thatidis present and properly validated.In the
updatemethod,idis directly destructured fromthis.ctx.params. Ensure the route is configured to passidand consider validatingidbefore invoking the service to prevent unexpected behavior.app/service/material-center/UserComponents.ts (1)
103-104: Use optional chaining to simplify property checks.Instead of:
if (component.npm && component.npm.package) { packageName = component.npm.package; }you could write:
packageName = component.npm?.package || '';🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 103-107: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| const config: PowerPartial<EggAppConfig> = {}; | ||
| config.dataCenter = { | ||
| host: process.env.DATA_CENTER_URL || 'http://localhost:1337', | ||
| host: process.env.DATA_CENTER_URL || 'http://localhost:1356', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify port consistency across the system
The default port for the data center host has been changed from 1337 to 1356. This aligns with the new material center services for component libraries, but it's important to ensure this port change is consistently reflected in other parts of the system.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other occurrences of the old port (1337) in the codebase
rg -l "1337" --type ts --type jsLength of output: 58
Action Item: Align Port Configuration Across All Environments
The new default port (1356) in config/config.local.ts looks correct for the updated material center services. However, our codebase search shows that config/config.unittest.ts still references the old port (1337). Please verify whether this discrepancy is intentional for unit tests and, if not, update config/config.unittest.ts to use the new port (1356) to maintain consistency across the system.
| const componentLibraryData = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.list(); | ||
| this.meta = metaData.data; | ||
| this.meta.componentLibrary = componentLibraryData.data; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for component library fetch
The setMeta method now fetches component library data, but there's no error handling for cases where the fetch operation fails. This could lead to undefined behavior if the service is unavailable.
private async setMeta(query?): Promise<I_Response> {
const metaData: I_Response = await this.service.appCenter.apps.schemaMeta(this.appId, query);
- const componentLibraryData = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.list();
+ let componentLibraryData = { data: [] };
+ try {
+ componentLibraryData = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.list();
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.ctx.logger.error('Failed to fetch component library data', error);
+ }
this.meta = metaData.data;
this.meta.componentLibrary = componentLibraryData.data;
return metaData;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const componentLibraryData = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.list(); | |
| this.meta = metaData.data; | |
| this.meta.componentLibrary = componentLibraryData.data; | |
| private async setMeta(query?): Promise<I_Response> { | |
| const metaData: I_Response = await this.service.appCenter.apps.schemaMeta(this.appId, query); | |
| let componentLibraryData = { data: [] }; | |
| try { | |
| componentLibraryData = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.list(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('Failed to fetch component library data', error); | |
| } | |
| this.meta = metaData.data; | |
| this.meta.componentLibrary = componentLibraryData.data; | |
| return metaData; | |
| } |
| private getPackages() { | ||
| const {componentLibrary} = this.meta; | ||
| const packages = componentLibrary.map((item) => ({ | ||
| name: item.name, | ||
| package: item.packageName, | ||
| version: item.version, | ||
| script: item.script, | ||
| css: item.css, | ||
| others: item.others | ||
| })); | ||
| return this.ctx.helper.getResponseData(packages); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for component library data
The getPackages method assumes that componentLibrary always exists and has the expected structure. Add validation to handle cases where the data might be missing or malformed.
private getPackages() {
- const {componentLibrary} = this.meta;
+ const componentLibrary = this.meta.componentLibrary || [];
const packages = componentLibrary.map((item) => ({
name: item.name,
package: item.packageName,
version: item.version,
script: item.script,
css: item.css,
others: item.others
}));
return this.ctx.helper.getResponseData(packages);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private getPackages() { | |
| const {componentLibrary} = this.meta; | |
| const packages = componentLibrary.map((item) => ({ | |
| name: item.name, | |
| package: item.packageName, | |
| version: item.version, | |
| script: item.script, | |
| css: item.css, | |
| others: item.others | |
| })); | |
| return this.ctx.helper.getResponseData(packages); | |
| } | |
| private getPackages() { | |
| - const {componentLibrary} = this.meta; | |
| + const componentLibrary = this.meta.componentLibrary || []; | |
| const packages = componentLibrary.map((item) => ({ | |
| name: item.name, | |
| package: item.packageName, | |
| version: item.version, | |
| script: item.script, | |
| css: item.css, | |
| others: item.others | |
| })); | |
| return this.ctx.helper.getResponseData(packages); | |
| } |
| //组件库 | ||
| subRouter.post('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update); | ||
| subRouter.post('/component-library/create',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create); | ||
| subRouter.delete('/component-library/delete/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.delete); | ||
| subRouter.get('/component-library/find',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
API Design: Consider using correct RESTful HTTP methods
The component library endpoints follow RESTful naming but are inconsistent with their HTTP methods. For example, the update endpoint uses POST instead of PUT, while delete correctly uses DELETE.
Consider adjusting the router methods to align with RESTful conventions:
-subRouter.post('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update);
+subRouter.put('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update);Also, add spacing after commas for consistency:
-subRouter.post('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update);
+subRouter.put('/component-library/update/:id', controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| //组件库 | |
| subRouter.post('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update); | |
| subRouter.post('/component-library/create',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create); | |
| subRouter.delete('/component-library/delete/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.delete); | |
| subRouter.get('/component-library/find',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find); | |
| //组件库 | |
| - subRouter.post('/component-library/update/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update); | |
| + subRouter.put('/component-library/update/:id', controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update); | |
| subRouter.post('/component-library/create',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create); | |
| subRouter.delete('/component-library/delete/:id',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.delete); | |
| subRouter.get('/component-library/find',controller.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find); |
| config.cors = { | ||
| origin: '*', //允许所有来源的请求 | ||
| allowMethods: 'GET,HEAD,PUT,POST,DELETE,PATCH', | ||
| credentials: true, // 如果需要支持带凭证的跨域请求，则设置为true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security risk: Overly permissive CORS configuration
The current CORS configuration allows requests from any origin (*) with credentials enabled. This is a significant security risk in production environments as it permits any website to make authenticated requests to your API.
Consider implementing a more restrictive CORS policy:
config.cors = {
- origin: '*', //允许所有来源的请求
+ origin: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? '*' : [
+ 'https://your-trusted-domain.com',
+ /\.your-domain\.com$/
+ ], // Only allow specific origins in production
allowMethods: 'GET,HEAD,PUT,POST,DELETE,PATCH',
credentials: true, // 如果需要支持带凭证的跨域请求，则设置为true
}Note: According to CORS specifications, you cannot use credentials: true with origin: '*'. If credentials are enabled, specific origins must be provided.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| config.cors = { | |
| origin: '*', //允许所有来源的请求 | |
| allowMethods: 'GET,HEAD,PUT,POST,DELETE,PATCH', | |
| credentials: true, // 如果需要支持带凭证的跨域请求，则设置为true | |
| } | |
| config.cors = { | |
| - origin: '*', //允许所有来源的请求 | |
| + origin: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? '*' : [ | |
| + 'https://your-trusted-domain.com', | |
| + /\.your-domain\.com$/ | |
| + ], // Only allow specific origins in production | |
| allowMethods: 'GET,HEAD,PUT,POST,DELETE,PATCH', | |
| credentials: true, // 如果需要支持带凭证的跨域请求，则设置为true | |
| } |
| async find(param){ | ||
| const query = qs.stringify(param); | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library?${query}` | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety with proper interfaces
The find method lacks type definitions for its parameters and return value, which reduces type safety.
Define an interface for the find parameters and specify the return type:
+interface FindParams {
+ name?: string;
+ description?: string;
+ [key: string]: any;
+}
-async find(param){
+async find(param: FindParams): Promise<any> {
const query = qs.stringify(param);
return this.query({
url: `component-library?${query}`
});
}| async update(param) { | ||
| const { id } = param; | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | ||
| method: E_Method.Put, | ||
| data: param | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety to the update method
Similar to the find method, the update method also lacks proper type definitions.
+interface UpdateComponentLibrary extends I_CreateComponentLibrary {
+ id: string | number;
+}
-async update(param) {
+async update(param: UpdateComponentLibrary): Promise<any> {
const { id } = param;
return this.query({
url: `component-library/${id}`,
method: E_Method.Put,
data: param
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async update(param) { | |
| const { id } = param; | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Put, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| interface UpdateComponentLibrary extends I_CreateComponentLibrary { | |
| id: string | number; | |
| } | |
| async update(param: UpdateComponentLibrary): Promise<any> { | |
| const { id } = param; | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Put, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } |
| export default class ComponentLibrary extends DataService{ | ||
|
|
||
| async create(param: I_CreateComponentLibrary) { | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: 'component-library' , | ||
| method: E_Method.Post, | ||
| data: param | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async find(param){ | ||
| const query = qs.stringify(param); | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library?${query}` | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async list() { | ||
| return this.query({ url: 'component-library' }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async update(param) { | ||
| const { id } = param; | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | ||
| method: E_Method.Put, | ||
| data: param | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| delete({ id }){ | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | ||
| method: E_Method.Delete | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to service methods
None of the methods include error handling, which is essential for robust API operations.
Add try-catch blocks to handle potential errors:
async create(param: I_CreateComponentLibrary) {
+ try {
return this.query({
url: 'component-library' ,
method: E_Method.Post,
data: param
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] create error:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
}Apply similar error handling to all other methods in the class.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class ComponentLibrary extends DataService{ | |
| async create(param: I_CreateComponentLibrary) { | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: 'component-library' , | |
| method: E_Method.Post, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| async find(param){ | |
| const query = qs.stringify(param); | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library?${query}` | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| async list() { | |
| return this.query({ url: 'component-library' }); | |
| } | |
| async update(param) { | |
| const { id } = param; | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Put, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| delete({ id }){ | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Delete | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class ComponentLibrary extends DataService { | |
| async create(param: I_CreateComponentLibrary) { | |
| try { | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: 'component-library', | |
| method: E_Method.Post, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] create error:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async find(param) { | |
| try { | |
| const query = qs.stringify(param); | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library?${query}` | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] find error:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async list() { | |
| try { | |
| return this.query({ url: 'component-library' }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] list error:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async update(param) { | |
| try { | |
| const { id } = param; | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Put, | |
| data: param | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] update error:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| delete({ id }) { | |
| try { | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Delete | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.ctx.logger.error('[ComponentLibrary] delete error:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| delete({ id }){ | ||
| return this.query({ | ||
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | ||
| method: E_Method.Delete | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent method signatures and add async keyword
The delete method signature is inconsistent with other methods and missing the async keyword.
-delete({ id }){
+async delete({ id }: { id: string | number }): Promise<any> {
return this.query({
url: `component-library/${id}`,
method: E_Method.Delete
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| delete({ id }){ | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Delete | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| async delete({ id }: { id: string | number }): Promise<any> { | |
| return this.query({ | |
| url: `component-library/${id}`, | |
| method: E_Method.Delete | |
| }); | |
| } |
| packageList.forEach(async (componentLibrary) => { | ||
| // 查询是否存在组件库 | ||
| const paramComponentLibrary = { | ||
| name: componentLibrary.name, | ||
| version: componentLibrary.version | ||
| } | ||
| const componentLibraryList = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find(paramComponentLibrary); | ||
| componentLibrary.packageName = componentLibrary.package; | ||
| componentLibrary.framework = 'Vue'; | ||
| componentLibrary.isOfficial = true; | ||
| componentLibrary.isDefault = true; | ||
| if(componentLibraryList.data.length) { | ||
| // 修改组件库 | ||
| componentLibrary.id = componentLibraryList.data[0].id; | ||
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update(componentLibrary); | ||
| }else { | ||
| // 新增组件库 | ||
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create(componentLibrary); | ||
| } | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using Array.forEach with async operations.
Here, packageList.forEach(async (componentLibrary) => { ... }) doesn’t wait for async calls to finish. Use await Promise.all(...) or a standard for ... of loop to ensure that all component library updates complete before proceeding. For example:
- packageList.forEach(async (componentLibrary) => {
+ await Promise.all(packageList.map(async (componentLibrary) => {
// ...
- })
+ }))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| packageList.forEach(async (componentLibrary) => { | |
| // 查询是否存在组件库 | |
| const paramComponentLibrary = { | |
| name: componentLibrary.name, | |
| version: componentLibrary.version | |
| } | |
| const componentLibraryList = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find(paramComponentLibrary); | |
| componentLibrary.packageName = componentLibrary.package; | |
| componentLibrary.framework = 'Vue'; | |
| componentLibrary.isOfficial = true; | |
| componentLibrary.isDefault = true; | |
| if(componentLibraryList.data.length) { | |
| // 修改组件库 | |
| componentLibrary.id = componentLibraryList.data[0].id; | |
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update(componentLibrary); | |
| }else { | |
| // 新增组件库 | |
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create(componentLibrary); | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| await Promise.all(packageList.map(async (componentLibrary) => { | |
| // 查询是否存在组件库 | |
| const paramComponentLibrary = { | |
| name: componentLibrary.name, | |
| version: componentLibrary.version | |
| } | |
| const componentLibraryList = await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.find(paramComponentLibrary); | |
| componentLibrary.packageName = componentLibrary.package; | |
| componentLibrary.framework = 'Vue'; | |
| componentLibrary.isOfficial = true; | |
| componentLibrary.isDefault = true; | |
| if(componentLibraryList.data.length) { | |
| // 修改组件库 | |
| componentLibrary.id = componentLibraryList.data[0].id; | |
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.update(componentLibrary); | |
| } else { | |
| // 新增组件库 | |
| await this.service.materialCenter.componentLibrary.create(componentLibrary); | |
| } | |
| })) |
1 participant
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Configuration
Bug Fixes