-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
pass featuregate args to config-operator to get rendered featuregates #6990
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this file actually have to be called this? In other render commands I've seen they search through the manifests folder and look at a partial object meta to identify if the file is a featuregate. Pre the installer supporting feature gates, it could have been called whatever I liked, nothing to say that's not still the case for some who have set up clusters without FG support in the installer before
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good point, spelling it out a bit more...
This PR will make the installer always lay down a feature set manifest. If there is a conflicting feature set manifest the installer will throw an error pre-install.
It would definitely be possible for a user to delete the installer-generated manifest. But in those cases only the feature set spec would be set and not the status, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. sometimes that's acceptable and the customer should know. I'm open to future refinement in 4.14, but I'd like to unstick azure ccm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are going to merge as is, I think we should probably check how many CI jobs rely on the ability to lay down a feature gate manifest blindly. I suspect it's non-zero and that this would break anyone currently relying on that mechanism
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A quick scan of the release repo leads me to:
Both of which, IIUC, set up a feature gate manifest under a custom name during the openshift-install manifest stage. The current logic wouldn't pick these up and would invalidate all techpreview and customnoupgrade CI jobs we have.
Either we need to rename those to fit the pattern, or fix the logic to run a search in CCO of the manifest dir (the latter being the preferred long term IMO)