Skip to content

Conversation

@davidleerh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from oriAdler and tzvatot December 10, 2025 02:17
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidleerh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 10, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Version field updated from v2.1.6 to v2.7.0 in .custom-gcl.yml and golangci-lint action version updated from v2.1 to v2.7.0 in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Updates
\.custom-gcl.yml, \.github/workflows/check-pull-request\.yaml
Updated version references to v2.7.0 across configuration and workflow files

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset. Add a description explaining the purpose of testing golangci-lint v2.7.0 and any compatibility or performance changes expected.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main changes: updating golangci-lint versions to v2.7.0 across configuration files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d4a462 and 1294f4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .custom-gcl.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/check-pull-request.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: Generate
  • GitHub Check: Test (1.21, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Test (1.21, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Test (1.21, ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.custom-gcl.yml (1)

1-1: Verify custom linter compatibility with v2.7.0.

This is a significant version bump (v2.1.6 → v2.7.0) for golangci-lint. Since the configuration references custom linters from the same repository (github.com/openshift-online/ocm-sdk-go/linters), ensure that these custom linters remain compatible with the new version's API.

Can you confirm that:

  1. The custom linters in github.com/openshift-online/ocm-sdk-go/linters are compatible with golangci-lint v2.7.0?
  2. Any breaking changes in the golangci-lint v2.7.0 release have been addressed in the custom linter code?
.github/workflows/check-pull-request.yaml (1)

71-71: Verify action and Go version compatibility with golangci-lint v2.7.0.

A significant version bump (v2.1 → v2.7.0) is being introduced. Ensure compatibility between:

  1. The GitHub Action version (golangci/golangci-lint-action@v9) and the new tool version (v2.7.0)
  2. Go 1.21 and golangci-lint v2.7.0

Additionally, since the PR title indicates intent to "test" this new version, please verify that:

  • The CI pipeline passes successfully with v2.7.0 (review the actual CI run results)
  • No new linting violations are introduced by stricter rules in v2.7.0 across the codebase

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@davidleerh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify 1294f4e link false /test verify
ci/prow/unit 1294f4e link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@davidleerh davidleerh closed this Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant