Add the testcase template

[yingzhanredhat]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/HYPERFLEET-404
Draft a template for e2e test case

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a standardized Markdown test-case template to capture metadata (title, feature, priority, status, automation, version, dates), description, optional preconditions, numbered test steps with action/expected-result checklists, separators for clarity, and an optional attachments section — promoting consistent, organized test documentation.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adds a new Markdown test-case template at testcases/template.md. The file is static documentation that defines a scaffold: Feature header, Test Title, Description, a meta-information table (Title, Feature, Pos/Neg, Priority, Status, Automation, Version, Created, Updated), optional Preconditions, a Test Steps section where each step includes a step description plus checklists for Steps/Action and Expected result/validation, separators, and an optional Attachments section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Add the testcase template' directly and clearly describes the main change—adding a new test case template file at testcases/template.md, which matches the stated purpose and the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom Pre-merge Checks in the settings.}

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6447f88 and 7d817b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• testcases/template.md

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• testcases/template.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

testcases/template.md (1)

53-56: Add a blank line before the Revision History table.

The Revision History table should be preceded by a blank line to comply with Markdown formatting standards. Insert a blank line between the section heading and the table.

🔎 Proposed fix

 ## Revision History (Optional)
+
 | Version | Date | Author | Changes |

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d900ee and 209c8de.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• testcases/template.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

testcases/template.md

54-54: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

testcases/template.md (1)

1-52: Well-structured and comprehensive template.

The test case template is well-organized with clear sections, helpful placeholders, and appropriate guidance for users. The metadata table, description, preconditions, and test steps structure provides a solid foundation for consistent e2e test case documentation.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI Agents

In @testcases/template.md:
- Around line 56-58: Add a blank line immediately before the Markdown table
header that starts with "| Version | Date | Author | Changes |" in template.md
to satisfy MD058; this means inserting an empty line above that table so the
Revision History table is surrounded by blank lines.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

testcases/template.md (1)

12-23: Consider reducing metadata redundancy.

The metadata table includes Title and Feature fields that duplicate information already present in the document headers (lines 4 and 2). This could be streamlined to avoid maintaining the same information in multiple places, or the headers could be removed in favor of a single metadata-driven structure.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 209c8de and 6447f88.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• testcases/template.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

testcases/template.md

56-56: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

testcases/template.md (2)

40-48: Reconsider the step header hierarchy.

Past feedback suggested using ### Step N: (h3) instead of #### Step N: (h4) for consistency with the overall section structure. Please verify this aligns with your team's preference and update accordingly if needed.

---

21-21: Verify consensus on the Author field necessity.

Past review feedback questioned whether the Author field is necessary, noting that all team members should share responsibility for maintaining test cases. Consider clarifying with the team whether this field should be included or if file history should be the primary source of authorship tracking.

[xueli181114]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xueli181114

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [xueli181114]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment