-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 357
Make opensearch_security.multitenancy.tenants.preferred configurable dynamically via security config api
#5986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
itsmevichu
wants to merge
9
commits into
opensearch-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
itsmevichu:feature/gh-5969
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+204
−6
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ab6ec77
Add preferred_tenants support to multitenancy config and dashboards i…
itsmevichu 0a97a7c
Add preferred_tenants to config files for tests
itsmevichu 26ae98e
Merge branch 'main' into feature/gh-5969
itsmevichu 4d42126
Add input validation for preferred_tenants
itsmevichu 45ffa49
Merge branch 'feature/gh-5969' of https://github.com/itsmevichu/secur…
itsmevichu 5f3f93e
Fix checkstyle
itsmevichu c46c2d7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into feature/gh-5969
itsmevichu 8f12076
Fix spotless checks
itsmevichu cf42566
Merge branch 'main' into feature/gh-5969
itsmevichu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I think key name is all that matters here so idk if we need this change. That being said, is it enforced that
allowedKeyWithConfigis strictly a subset ofallowedKeys?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand, we don’t need the DataType; just the key name is sufficient, and I’ll update the changes.
And
allowedKeysWithConfigisn’t required to be a strict subset ofallowedKeys. IfallowedKeysWithConfigis present, it takes precedence; otherwise, we fallback toallowedKeys. Going forward, for any new API we define, we can start usingallowedKeysWithConfigdirectly, which will make it easier when we eventually remove allowedKeys completely.