Conversation
Reviewed-by: jsjolen, aartemov
Reviewed-by: jsjolen, aartemov
Reviewed-by: erikj, kbarrett
…lagless Reviewed-by: wkemper
Reviewed-by: syan, jiefu
…mely Reviewed-by: wkemper
…-identifier" l10n key Reviewed-by: almatvee
Reviewed-by: azvegint, serb, prr
…nt.java#id4 failed Reviewed-by: kevinw, dholmes
…processors Reviewed-by: jiefu, dholmes
Reviewed-by: fyang, wenanjian
Reviewed-by: dholmes, iwalulya
…JDK-8378110 (RuntimeMXBean.getInputArguments()) Reviewed-by: syan, kevinw
… smallest index Reviewed-by: rriggs, vyazici
Reviewed-by: fyang
Reviewed-by: naoto
Reviewed-by: almatvee
…nal.ModuleInfo Reviewed-by: almatvee
Reviewed-by: almatvee
Reviewed-by: jbhateja, psandoz
Reviewed-by: almatvee
…ocessBuilder test, and re-enable tests Reviewed-by: stuefe
Reviewed-by: kbarrett, iwalulya
Reviewed-by: kbarrett, iwalulya
Reviewed-by: dholmes, kbarrett
… local var initializer has been type checked Reviewed-by: vromero
Reviewed-by: epeter, dfenacci
…essing during error reporting Co-authored-by: Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuenaga@openjdk.org> Reviewed-by: ysuenaga, iwalulya
…rmittent fails Reviewed-by: syan, dfuchs
…compiling huge switch statement Reviewed-by: rasbold, dfenacci, mchevalier
…8329077 Reviewed-by: fyang, epeter
…Exception Reviewed-by: jlahoda
…16 intrinsics Reviewed-by: dfenacci, rgiulietti, rriggs
…n_prefetch Reviewed-by: mdoerr, kvn, tschatzl
…n: Could not find specified process" Reviewed-by: kevinw, sgehwolf
Reviewed-by: bmaillard, dfenacci, roland
Reviewed-by: chagedorn, epeter
…ve to current JDK native memory use Reviewed-by: azafari
Reviewed-by: adinn, asmehra
Reviewed-by: vyazici
Reviewed-by: chagedorn, snatarajan, roland
Reviewed-by: dholmes, matsaave
Reviewed-by: bpb, naoto
…ntly Reviewed-by: syan, jpai
Reviewed-by: jlu, bpb, liach, iris
Reviewed-by: stuefe
|
👋 Welcome back rkennke! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@rkennke This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
rkennke
force-pushed
the
merge-jdk-27+14
branch
from
c0886f4 to
68e4f68
Compare
openjdk
bot
added
ready
Webrevs
|
Reviewed-by: stuefe
Reviewed-by: stuefe
rkennke
force-pushed
the
merge-jdk-27+14
branch
from
68e4f68 to
de87d26
Compare
|
@rkennke Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
20 participants
Merging from upstream jdk-27+14.
Most notably, this merges the new object monitor table (JDK-8373595), which poses a little problem on the fast-path of the monitor lookup. I disabled that fast-path for now, added comments and opened JDK-8380981 to track it.
Testing:
Progress
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/211/head:pull/211$ git checkout pull/211Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/211$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/211/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 211View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 211Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/pull/211.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment