Skip to content

8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex#227

Open
rudraroop wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
rudraroop:8372710-Backport
Open

8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex#227
rudraroop wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
rudraroop:8372710-Backport

Conversation

@rudraroop
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rudraroop rudraroop commented Feb 4, 2026

Hi,

This is a backport of JDK-8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex

Original patch applies cleanly to jdk25u-dev

Reasoning -

The format for IOException was changed in JDK-8352533. This format change was made in openjdk25u-dev, but not updated in this test.

Background -

Originally, the fix was made in ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk25#40 done by @theresa-m as IBM's AIX relies on this format. It was then contributed to openJDK by @Harshit470250 in JDK-8372710


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Error

 ⚠️ This PR only contains changes already present in the target

Issue

  • JDK-8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/227/head:pull/227
$ git checkout pull/227

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/227
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/227/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 227

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 227

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/227.diff

@rudraroop rudraroop closed this Feb 4, 2026
@rudraroop rudraroop reopened this Feb 4, 2026
@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Feb 4, 2026
@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Hi @rudraroop, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user rudraroop" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2026

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport b3e063c2c34ac12ae2a566617560ecc52253262d 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Feb 4, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2026

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Feb 4, 2026
@rudraroop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

rudraroop commented Feb 4, 2026

/covered

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Feb 4, 2026
@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Feb 19, 2026
@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status labels Mar 3, 2026
@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 5, 2026

@rudraroop This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant