-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Solve problem #22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solve problem #22
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR addresses multiple tasks as described in SOLUTIONS.md by adding SQL queries for analytics, improving concurrency in a file aggregator, and fixing a thread-safety bug in the counter implementation.
- Added SQL queries in queries.py for Task A and Task B.
- Implemented a concurrent file aggregator in aggregator.py.
- Introduced locking in buggy_counter.py for thread safety (with a missing threading import).
- Documented solution notes in SOLUTIONS.md for context and rationale.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tasks/04-sql-reasoning/python/queries.py | Added new SQL queries for analytics & optimization. |
| tasks/03-sync-aggregator/python/aggregator.py | Implemented a concurrent file aggregation mechanism using ThreadPoolExecutor. |
| tasks/02-fix-the-bug/python/buggy_counter.py | Added a lock for thread safety; however, missing an import for the threading module. |
| SOLUTIONS.md | Added solution notes outlining the approaches and rationale for the tasks addressed. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
tasks/02-fix-the-bug/python/buggy_counter.py:7
- The code uses threading.Lock() but does not include an import for the threading module. Please add 'import threading' at the beginning of the file to ensure the lock is properly defined.
_lock = threading.Lock()
|
Ping @boomNDS the task 3 test is failing, just want to make sure you want us to evaluate the tasks as-is or you want to fix it before dead line. thank you! 🙏 |
|
@kengggg Yes for the task 3 still the same |
Read explantation from
SOLUTIONS.md.