Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 14, 2026

The review comment references a typo "focusses" → "focuses" in README.md:5, but this word does not exist in any tracked files or git history.

Investigation Results

  • Searched all markdown files, README.md (current and historical), and entire codebase
  • Checked commit dcee095 and all ancestors
  • The word "focusses" only appears in PR Uv docs #209's description text: "This PR focusses on a simplifcation..."

Analysis

The review bot likely flagged the PR description rather than file content. PR descriptions cannot be modified through code changes.

Awaiting clarification: Should I address other typos from the review (e.g., "reffer" → "refer" on line 130), or is there a different file/location for the "focusses" typo?


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2026
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Address changes based on feedback for Uv docs PR Unable to locate "focusses" typo referenced in review feedback Jan 14, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from beniroquai January 14, 2026 14:37
@beniroquai beniroquai marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 14:43
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 14, 2026 14:43
@beniroquai beniroquai merged commit d649168 into uv-docs Jan 14, 2026
1 check passed
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@beniroquai beniroquai deleted the copilot/sub-pr-209-again branch January 14, 2026 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants