Skip to content

Conversation

@UlrikeS91
Copy link
Contributor

see #123

@lzehl, note that I removed the ontology ID and synonym from parcellation model since these seemed to be more specific to the old parcellation scheme (and maybe not even perfectly suitable to that either based on our discussion on Tuesday).

@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 requested a review from lzehl August 22, 2025 07:29
@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 self-assigned this Aug 22, 2025
@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 added the SANDS SANDS related instances - addition of new or update of existing ones label Aug 22, 2025
UlrikeS91 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
accord. to #344
UlrikeS91 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
accord. to #344
UlrikeS91 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
accord. to #344
UlrikeS91 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
accord. to #344
@Raphael-Gazzotti
Copy link
Member

Raphael-Gazzotti commented Aug 22, 2025

Apologies for the mess with the previous commits. There was still an issue with the autopopulation, but it’s resolved now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

SANDS SANDS related instances - addition of new or update of existing ones

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

openMINDS_controlledTerms/instances/atlasType: are all atlases either probabilistic or deterministic, and when should one use parcellationScheme?

3 participants