Enhance release caching with missing IDs #14
Conversation
Verified that artist_id, album_id, and track_id are correctly populated in release dictionaries during API fetch. Updated the caching logic to rely on these present fields instead of treating them as missing, removing outdated comments. Validated with a reproduction test case.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
The release building code was previously updated to include
artist_id,album_id, andtrack_idin thereleaseslist, but the caching logic still contained comments stating they were missing and needed to be added. This change verifies the presence of these IDs and cleans up the caching code to use them directly, ensuring they are stored in the database cache.artist_id,album_id,track_idinreleaseslist.tests/test_cache_ids.py(and cleaned it up).PR created automatically by Jules for task 4590499506295619846 started by @opbenesh