Skip to content

Conversation

@leavesster
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

重构

  • 简化了类型定义结构,移除了可选字段,以优化 API 接口设计。

高层次概述

SubflowBlockFinished 接口中移除了可选的 result 属性(类型为 Record<string, any>),简化了该接口的结构定义。

变化

内聚组 / 文件 变化摘要
接口属性移除
packages/oocana-types/src/external/reporter.ts
SubflowBlockFinished 接口中删除了 readonly result?: Record<string, any>; 可选属性

预估代码审查工作量

🎯 1 (简单) | ⏱️ ~3 分钟

  • 确认移除此属性不会影响依赖该接口的其他代码
  • 检查是否有其他类型定义或实现需要相应更新

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ❓ Inconclusive 作者未提供任何 PR 描述内容。由于描述完全缺失,无法判断其是否与变更集相关,也无法评估其是否为与主题相关的有意义信息。虽然该检查被定义为较宽松的检查,但完全缺失的描述属于无法确定的情况,因为没有实际内容来进行评估。 建议作者添加 PR 描述,说明为什么要移除 result 字段、这个变更的业务影响或技术原因。即使只是简短的说明,也能帮助审阅者理解变更的背景和意图。
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed PR 标题"fix: remove result field"符合指定的格式要求,采用了<type>: <subject>的形式,其中type为"fix",subject为"remove result field"。该标题直接对应了变更集中的主要改动,即从SubflowBlockFinished接口中移除result可选属性,准确概括了此次变更的核心内容。标题使用英文,符合语言要求。

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f4e072 and 1baa481.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/oocana-types/src/external/reporter.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/oocana-types/src/external/reporter.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: check

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@leavesster leavesster enabled auto-merge (squash) October 29, 2025 05:36
@leavesster leavesster merged commit 54f321a into main Oct 29, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@leavesster leavesster deleted the fix branch October 29, 2025 05:37
@oomol-bot oomol-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants