Skip to content

Rebase#1

Closed
gdgellatly wants to merge 238 commits intoodoonz:18.0-mig-mail_optional_follower_notificationfrom
OCA:18.0
Closed

Rebase#1
gdgellatly wants to merge 238 commits intoodoonz:18.0-mig-mail_optional_follower_notificationfrom
OCA:18.0

Conversation

@gdgellatly
Copy link

No description provided.

Pablo Paez and others added 30 commits December 5, 2024 10:12
Currently translated at 100.0% (6 of 6 strings)

Translation: social-17.0/social-17.0-mail_partner_forwarding
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-17-0/social-17-0-mail_partner_forwarding/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (6 of 6 strings)

Translation: social-17.0/social-17.0-mail_partner_forwarding
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-17-0/social-17-0-mail_partner_forwarding/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (8 of 8 strings)

Translation: social-14.0/social-14.0-mail_quoted_reply
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-14-0/social-14-0-mail_quoted_reply/ca/
Currently translated at 100.0% (8 of 8 strings)

Translation: social-14.0/social-14.0-mail_quoted_reply
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-14-0/social-14-0-mail_quoted_reply/es/
atchuthan and others added 28 commits June 6, 2025 15:45
[FIX] add title to <i> tag and removed console.log in js

Co-authored-by: Miquel Raïch <miquel.raich@forgeflow.com>

Co-authored-by: Miquel Raïch <miquel.raich@forgeflow.com>
Add a direct access from activity calendar and form views to the linked model instance.

Bedore this change, it was not possible to access to the model instance linked to an activity from the calendar view nor from the view opened by clicling on the activity into the calendar

[IMP] mail_activiy_board: Restrict related_model_instance selection to models supporting mail acitvities

Co-Authored-By: Miquel Raïch <miquel.raich@eficent.com>
users when accessing records that inherit mail.activity mixing
…s only visible if the user has the permission.

TT43037
Currently translated at 95.4% (21 of 22 strings)

Translation: social-16.0/social-16.0-mail_activity_board
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-16-0/social-16-0-mail_activity_board/fr/
`image_small` field has been renamed to `image_small` since the use of `image.mixin`
Currently translated at 100.0% (22 of 22 strings)

Translation: social-17.0/social-17.0-mail_activity_board
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/social-17-0/social-17-0-mail_activity_board/it/
…ds anymore

The regular relational model fetches records using web_search_read (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7c640426903bc6fa4c972406df1f0905557cf7e5/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/relational_model.js#L582). This method formats reference fields as

{ id: { id: 27, model: "res.partner"}, display_name: "Azure Interior, Brandon Freeman"}

(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7c640426903bc6fa4c972406df1f0905557cf7e5/addons/web/models/models.py#L220-L224)

This structure is used when rendering the relational model widget (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7c640426903bc6fa4c972406df1f0905557cf7e5/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/utils.js#L467-L475).

However, the calendar web model fetches records using search_read (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7c640426903bc6fa4c972406df1f0905557cf7e5/addons/web/static/src/views/calendar/calendar_model.js#L489). This returns values for reference fields in the conventional format "res.partner,27", but they are still rendered by the same widget when the calendar popup view is opened, resulting in an error 'TypeError: value.id is undefined'.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@opener.amsterdam>
Signed-off-by hbrunn
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: mail-18.0/mail-18.0-mail_tracking
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/mail-18-0/mail-18-0-mail_tracking/
@gdgellatly gdgellatly closed this Jun 11, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.