Skip to content

Conversation

@shawntanzk
Copy link
Collaborator

This branch is with reason and I removed disjoint and owl:Nothing equiv classes
I've also regenerated the report comparing the original (in master) report vs one generated by this

@shawntanzk shawntanzk self-assigned this Mar 10, 2022
}
}
FILTER (STRSTARTS(STR(?sup), "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_"))
# Can't get double filter to work!
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dosumis The "UBERON_0002616" filter technically can work, however, many classes are mapped to "UBERON_0002616" (wrongly so for now) - adding this filter would remove a lot of classes that are in and need fixing rather than removal.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the idea was to remove very general classifications that come in through inference, rather than assertion as with this.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@shawntanzk shawntanzk Mar 11, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is, strangely enough, 8266 terms (around half of all terms) that are subclass of http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002616, all of which are inferred. I've uploaded the terms here: https://github.com/obophenotype/ABA_Uberon/blob/b1a0daed3376f10719c6d8dc2d246772bb5bf157/src/ontology/report/uberon0002616.tsv

hkir-dev and others added 3 commits March 15, 2022 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants