Skip to content

Conversation

@danielroe
Copy link
Member

📚 Description

this is a PR experimenting with tsdown - for a couple of reasons:

  1. moving away from jiti stub mode for CLI allows more accurate performance testing
  2. this fixes some build failures in perf(info): migrate from clipboardy to copy-paste #1087

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 21, 2025

nuxt-cli-playground

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-nuxt@1095
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxi@1095
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/cli@1095

commit: 1ae00e9

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

📦 Bundle Size Comparison

📉 nuxi

Metric Base Head Diff
Rendered 5083.62 KB 5020.76 KB -62.86 KB (-1.24%)

📉 nuxt-cli

Metric Base Head Diff
Rendered 108.86 KB 100.95 KB -7.91 KB (-7.27%)

📈 create-nuxt

Metric Base Head Diff
Rendered 2182.16 KB 2321.85 KB +139.69 KB (+6.40%)

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 21, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1095 will not alter performance

Comparing build/tsdown (1ae00e9) with main (0826403)

Summary

✅ 2 untouched

@danielroe danielroe merged commit 1848fa9 into main Oct 21, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the build/tsdown branch October 21, 2025 18:56
This was referenced Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants