Skip to content

[18.0][MIG] l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization: Migration to 18.0#846

Open
deeniiz wants to merge 5 commits into18.0from
18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization
Open

[18.0][MIG] l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization: Migration to 18.0#846
deeniiz wants to merge 5 commits into18.0from
18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization

Conversation

@deeniiz
Copy link
Collaborator

@deeniiz deeniiz commented Feb 26, 2026

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 44.68085% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (18.0@4b294fd). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...orate_regularization/models/l10n_es_aeat_report.py 35.71% 18 Missing ⚠️
...03_special_prorate_regularization/models/mod303.py 50.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             18.0     #846   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   44.68%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        4           
  Lines           ?       47           
  Branches        ?        5           
=======================================
  Hits            ?       21           
  Misses          ?       26           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@deeniiz deeniiz force-pushed the 18.0-mig-l10n_es_aeat_mod303_special_prorate_regularization branch from b4d98e2 to 704be34 Compare February 27, 2026 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants